Functionally all, if they're the Prime Minister of a majority parliament. A good deal if they're PM in a hung parliament where the NDP isn't dead set on skewering itself.
Kichae
We can stop sucking the US's dick without replacing it with Russia's, China's, or... North fucking Korea's?
Seriously, making hating the US your whole personality doesn't make the fake communists a) worthwhile or b) communists.
How does one decide which "news" contains personal politics and which doesn't? The act of deciding is, itself, an act of personal politics.
Free speech means the government can't sanction you for unpopular speech. It says absolutely nothing about private citizens.
You're not entitled to an audience, or to anybody else's platform.
They have too many thoughts of too low a quality already. I'm not lending them any of mine.
Rewarding the employer for underpaying the employees is not, in any way, the right direction, though? Not tipping is just telling the employees "I don't care if you get paid, so long as I get what I want"
The social network that hides your mutuals worse than YouTube hides your subscribed content, and which explicitly and openly advertises first party bot accounts as a feature is what you consider the "best social network"?
What's the worst? Your actual friends and family?
I don't know. I don't want to play apologetics for the tankies, but showing up in a tankie community and telling them that they're supporting fascism just sounds like trolling to me. You know what you're doing, and them taking the bait isn't power tripping.
This level of splitting hairs and borderline decision paralysis is itself a symptom of autism, FWIW.
Well, the different "instances" are different websites, each hosting and serving their own copy of the original post and comments. You're interacting with your local copy, and your comments are forwarded along to the original website. The original website then sends out copies of your comment to all the other websites that have requested updates.
If your website has banned someone, it will reject content from that user. That's what being banned means: I refuse to host your posts. Just because your posts are being routed through a 3rd party doesn't mean I want to host them.
Like, if you got banned from Reddit, they wouldn't let you post there, either. If you commented on a mirror of a post, hosted on a different website, you wouldn't expect that comment to show up on Resdit, would you? Well, that's what the fediverse is: a network of content mirrors. Yes, they're mirrors that, generally, tey to synchronize with each other, but they're still mirrors. And independent mirrors at that.
They will never be perfectly synchronized. There's no true Lemmy to reflect. No whole. There is only what is locally hosted.
Now apply this logic to healthcare so I can tell just big of a problem you are for society