Funny how that works, so in Musk's view, the "good things" are thanks to Grok, the "bad things" are thanks to the input data
Kazumara
That sounds a little more innocent than what the actual claims are. According to the friend of the flight attendant, when she was massaging him normally, he surprisingly uncovered his penis, touched her and offered a horse for sex. She didn't agree with any of that and rejected the offer.
If they had just made a deal normally I wouldn't see an issue.
Yeah you're probably right.
Although the peak power you can withdraw from a battery is also an important factor, the energy capacity would be the expected size to be reported here.
During an administration that doesn't doubt climate science, no less
That can be an extremely stressful thing to happen to a parent.
Only an involved one, not so much an absentee father, who seems to be mostly concerned with spreading his genes. He's at 12 children now.
How long would it take for the sellers to price in those extra 25k they can wring out of buyers?
Not actually him, don't worry
Thank you for sharing that information.
Then it really does seems like some reviewers were just entering the grey zone willingly, to get phones intended for advertisements and used them for reviews anyway.
There are also some on Facebook's, Amazon's or ByteDance's respective teats
The second half of the article goes into that a bit. Seems like some reviewers were also grouped into that program before, and the terms weren't like this before.
The Verge spoke with other independent reviewers and freelance tech journalists who say that they were grouped into the Team Pixel program for review units in the past. For those in the latter group, the new stipulation is a threat to their integrity and livelihood. Matlock says he’s since quit the Team Pixel program over the new terms.
YouTuber Kevin Nether, who runs The Tech Ninja channel, also says the clause led him to quit the Team Pixel program. “As someone who reviews technology for a living, I work with many brands. To be cornered into using one product — that doesn’t work for me, and that’s nothing I want to participate in.”
Nether echoes that he’s never seen this kind of stipulation in previous Team Pixel surveys. Usually, he says, the survey gauges a creator’s interest in various topics, like sports or fashion, to identify areas for collaboration. In the past, he says he’s made it clear to Team Pixel representatives that outside an obligatory post, he will review the device as normal. Nether also says this exclusivity term is atypical. Usually, when brands demand exclusivity from creators or brand ambassadors, they’ll offer payment, have clear disclosure rules, and have limited timelines.
Either Google changed the focus of the program, or the intent wasn't clear enough in previous years
Holy shit, what sort of trolling is this?
Hitting all the high notes, from "kids shouldn't have it better than I did", over pulling their own boots straps, to "good slavery".