Where did you read that? I only saw Johannes Berg saying he couldn't maintain that stack too, after three days.
Kazumara
joined 1 year ago
I'm using Firefox, I heard it was the biggest fork of Firefox.
I would say that usually the courts see through thinly veiled attempts to put up a fake separation between decision makers and their positions. But lately I'm not sure of anything.
I'm trying to figure out where this was but finding conflicting reports online.
Either https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tayibe
Or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taybeh,_Ramallah
Does anyone have some hard info?
PS: My current assumption is that it's separate from the well reported on Feb 1st wedding raid in Hebron, but I'm not certain.
That was pretty good. I finally put away things that have been laying around for over a year.
Damn, brb, I'm gonna go put some stuff away even if I don't know where to put everything
I don't have an answer but I have another example:
"A part of something" gets turned into "apart of something", I assume this is also not caught by autocorrect because "apart from something" would actually exist.
Very very very asexual?
Kou just arrived in France, and was meeting Catherine, who is a kwōtā and had grown up in France, for the first time. Catherin spoke French in the first panel. Kou assumed - correctly - that Catherine would speak Japanese, and tried speaking Japanese to her in the second panel, but Catherine faked not understanding it in the third panel.
The reading order is: Right column top to bottom, then left column top to bottom.
I mean sure, we could talk about Google's motivations, I'm not a fan of their sycophancy either.
But I don't think it matters. In a civil suit first of all President Sheinbaum would have to assert a tort against Google, and for that you need to demonstrate you were damaged due to anothers wrongdoing or at least negligence.
So yes, it actually is about the harm. And if that is given, then they still have to argue, that it was wrongful or at least negligent to add the "sensitive country" name of the area to Google Maps. But I don't think there are any laws that restrict Google or any other private mappers to using any source of information in particular, so that will be hard.
Of course they are morally bankrupt, but legally I just don't see anything significant happening.
And in the meantime the executive order had the intended effect of making the U.S. Board on Georgraphic Names change the name in their systems, so Google can use that as a fig leaf too
I'm not suggesting she should kiss ass, far be it from me. But I still don't see a good motive for this move. A civil suit is not going to get her anything, she's just highlighting Trumps symbolic bullshit even more.
And then when the suit either goes against her or goes for her but results in laughibly low compensation because the measureable harm is not significant, then it will look like a confirmation of the power of the convict in chief.
Why is Salad Lady still making public statements? She had her chance and sucked too much, she can retire from politics and do some manual work now.