Kacarott

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 17 points 5 months ago

code.golf approves

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Make sure not to punch anyone else though, cus I'm quite sure that brain damage is a leading cause of nazism

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 3 points 5 months ago

Finally a worthy workstation

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Yes thanks for sticking with me

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Ah! This entire time I thought it meant separate but equal leagues in sport being unethical.

That makes much more sense now

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

That separating leagues by gender is ethical

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I believe it is self evident, while you are the one claiming that separate but equal is not ethical, which is in contradiction to this.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Because segregation is historically driven by racist motivations such as attempting to prevent different races from interacting.

Why is it ethical to separate sports leagues by gender?

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (10 children)

? I was confused by your statement "separate but equal is not ethical" because it's what we already do in sports, so I wanted to ask about it. I already stated that I don't think a separate league for trans people is a good idea, if that's why you are refusing to answer me.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 0 points 5 months ago (12 children)

No they aren't, but there is a separate women's league for most sports. So again, I'm wondering if you find that unethical?

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 0 points 5 months ago (14 children)

separate but equal is not an ethical solution

But isn't this how sport already is? Do you think gender restrictions should be removed from sport altogether?

I don't think a trans-only league makes any sense, but I'm just curious about your stance.

view more: ‹ prev next ›