Conniving!
JustMy2c
joined 2 years ago
I got out!
Rented out my apt to others and the tiny difference to my advantage was enough to sustain myself in south America (working a bit and or volunteer or living in free housing(my ex's)
I now got some more money (sold the apt) and do holiday rentals here, but even without that it's just few hundred per month for food and going out, maybe 95$ extra for social local Healthcare (for 2!)
Don't ever think you need to be a millionaire to get out. Government guaranteed bonds pay 9.5% per year.
So each 10k usd you put in a guaranteed usd account = 87$ free money each month. Need 50k for bit over 400$/mo which is the local minimum wage. 100% government guaranteed (if you split in 2 banks)
Thatchers plan would have worked if and only when:
LAND IS PROVIDED FOR NEW PROJECTS (destination plan on national provincial and local level)
ALL INCOME FROM RENT TO BUY (or similar) IS SPEND ON NEW PROJECTS
ALL PROJECTS ARE GUARANTEED BY THE BUILDER (no excess costs for any reason : sign your profitable contract but then you are obliged to deliver exactly what is promised or you'll never get another gov project again)
No, it would BE BOUGHT by government at fair price (they know the fair price, just look your houses tax bill)
Or built by them.
And then rented out with a certain maximum rental price per Sq Mt like 10$ so 50sq m (500sq ft) = 500$/month
Most importantly, they would be obliged to make it Energy efficient by their contract with the state so much lower electric and heating bill, maybe even topped off with solar, would be small percentage of a new building but cut costs for actual people.
Not saying it's perfect in Holland (they have shortages because no new land available to build new social housing projects), but it sure works!
I Holland we have woning bouw organisaties That are BY law obliged to offer services and structured management, checked by impartial state department and who can be relieved of function (transfering the properties to another organization or splitting them up etcetera). Yes, needs to be overview, laws and such. Maybe even subsidies for new buildings.
But NO PROFIT ANYWHERE.
Not for public basic housing. Come on, do we really wanna admit RUZZIA and CHINA beat us on this?
Get rid of excess money ? Turns out being extremely rich isn't that rewarding, especially once everyone knows.
CHRISTIANITY HAS ALWAYS BEEN USED TO FOOL ABUSE AND TERRORIZE THE PEOPLE. NOW IS NO EXCEPTION.
In a natural baked pottery the water is pretty ok to drink. Not cold but DEFINITELY not warm.
My only preferred sugar intake is imported 7 year old panamenian ABUELO rum. Highly recommended much better as a 12yo whiskey and just 19.95$ usd
Correcto but maybe it DOES apply to most asked questions, if you know where I'm going with that
Well, it is indeed from the counter from a ten year old ceramic dispenser.
It keeps it moderately acceptable to drink, really. I live in hot Ecuador and no ac in main rooms except master bedroom
YES THE SUGAR FREE SODA ACT IS VERY IMPORTANT.
1$/L TAX FOR ALL SUGAR AND SUGAR REPLACEMENT AND JUICE. NO EXCEPTIONS.
Really, you don't need sugar for a good drink (unless distilled).
Ice cold lemonade from extract or mint from extract is LITERALLY only water.
Ps Drink room temp water and you won't even want any cold drinks ever again.
It's fantastic for finding content.
Unfortunately less evolved humans could easily be deceived and led to extreme values, whether right or left (probably BOTH!)