My first instinct is "Here We Go Again" but I think there's an existing map company that would take exception to that.
InsertUser
joined 6 years ago
@sven @openstreetmap I think the tagging you're showing *should* be fine, but as I think the :forward and backward tags aren't as widely supported I'd put the lower speed as a generic maxspeed for that bit of road as well. That way simple software will default to the lower limit and more sophisticated software will use the correct one.
@RubberElectrons @strubbl
I don't know if @geomob are running anything in the US these days. @OpenStreetMapUS might have events that interest you?
@infeeeee @openstreetmap
Yes I was.
In the current state they are useless for showing the images, but it might be better to keep them temporarily and use the changeset information to contact the original 'uploader' and see if they'd be willing to upload via e.g. @MapComplete (who have a @panoramax instance now).
iD should not be allowing the creation of these so I think someone should open a bug report if it isn't already fixed.
@infeeeee @lukstru @openstreetmap
That looks like something that should work in an HTML <img > tag, but doesn't. Maybe it has been truncated?
@controlphreak @snrkl
Now that StreetComplete has overlay layers for places and things you can add most of the thing you'd want to add in person.
I know the author has already mentioned it, but MapComplete.org might be a good site to look at if you're just starting and have local knowledge of an area. I know in my early days mapping that just looking at a list of map features would remind me about places that I've know about forever and never thought to put on a map. The MapComplete themes might have some obvious omissions that you can fix quickly.
view more: next ›
@CubeOfCheese
The first part is a reference to my general feeling of deja vu.
The second is a reference to these guys: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here/_WeGo