ImplyingImplications

joined 2 years ago
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We already had that. It's called Azumanga Daioh.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 29 points 11 months ago

We gotta convince the non-canadians this is how maple syrup is made

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Technically he's a tanuki, which is in the canine family

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I remember an interview with a former NASA engineer that said NASA would never be able to do anything near what SpaceX (or any other private company) can do. The reason given is that SpaceX spent billions after billions on what were essentially very expensive fireworks until they finally achieved a breakthrough. A breakthrough that wasn't a guarantee. Even Musk himself had said he would have eventually closed SpaceX if they hadn't achieved something and it would have been a multi billion dollar failure. He, and everyone else really, got very lucky.

Imagine NASA asking taxpayers for another billion dollars after blowing up the last billion with no guarantee this next billion would produce anything but another explosion. How many times would the public foot that bill? Not even once. Not while people don't have healthcare and homelessness and hunger exist. The government can't justify it and that's just how it is. The only way we get space travel, with our current system, is to hope someone with a lot of money is willing to bet it on a breakthrough. It sucks but the problem isn't Musk, it's the system that makes us reliant on billionaires for nice things.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 32 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It becomes false advertising when you prove them wrong in court. Few people want to do that so most ads are bullshit. Even if they do get proven wrong, the settlement money is typically peanuts to the impact their ads have on sales. Red Bull paid $13 million for their tagline of "red bull gives you wings" while making several billion a year.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 92 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 114 points 11 months ago (9 children)

I was a funeral director and got this question a lot.

  1. That's not how vikings had funerals. The only Norse who had that type of send off is Baldr, son of Odin, in Norse mythology. Real Norse were cremated or buried. Important people had huge burial mounds since they'd be buried with a lot of their possessions. In reality, if you burned a boat with a body on it, the result would be a charred decaying corpse floating back to land in a day or two. A ship doesn't have enough wood to completly burn a body and bacteria in decaying dead bodies produce gas which causes dead bodies to float.

  2. It is possible to "bury at sea" depending on the area. The Canadian government charges a significant amount for a permit to do so and it comes with a lot of conditions like a weighted and sealed casket and being dropped far enough from the shoreline. I've heard they make the process as difficult and costly as possible as a way to discourage the practice. However, there are no restrictions on scattering cremated remains at sea!

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 54 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Holy shit, what hospital puts "risk of stroke" that low on the triage list?

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 82 points 11 months ago (8 children)

It's honestly impressive how we went from "only nerds know tech" in gen x to "everyone knows tech" in millennials to "only nerds know tech" in gen z.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago

First principalmaxxing

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago

"How can you kill that which has no life?"

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

Bags of sand

view more: ‹ prev next ›