He can still purchase things by leveraging his net worth even if he doesn't have liquid cash. The Twitter purchase shows that as well.
ImplyingImplications
if you bought something that went on sale next month, does that mean you are entitled to a refund?
Steam literally gives refunds if you buy something and then it goes on sale.
The Conservative Party of Canada wants to shutdown the CBC, so it's gotta be good.
These boots were made for walking, but that's not what they do. Nowadays these boots are used to hold your arrows for you.
No homo. 2% is the limit!
Nobody sees a sports athlete get a million dollar contract and says "I hope this guy is saving for retirement. How does he expect to make money when he can't pitch fastballs at 100 mph?" Why does this comment only happen to women being models?
i think there are some crimes that will be prosecuted by your home country anyway
It seems pretty rare, but some countries do have laws that essentially apply to citizens, regardless of where they are.
The PROTECT Act is a US law that makes it illegal for any US citizen to have sex with minors, regardless of where in the world it occurs. It's essentially an anti-sex tourism law. Japan and South Korea warned their citizens that smoking cannabis in Canada will still result in prosecution after Canada legalized it.
Theoretically, the ship could be seized by the military of any country. Not following international laws means not being protected by international laws.
Casual Navigation talks a bit about this: What Law Applies In International Waters? Essentially, the ship needs to be registered to a country and the laws of that country apply while on the ship. Most ships register themselves in a country with very lax laws, known as a "flag of convenience". The laws of Libera, Panama, and Marshall Islands must be pretty convenient since those are countries most ships get registered.
What happens if you don't register your ship? It's the same as not having a passport. You're going to have a hard time when you want to dock at a port.
It's a Japanese patent. I'm not sure how it would hold up internationally, but Pocketpair is also a Japanese company and this lawsuit is entirely within the Japanese legal system. That probably gives Nintendo a bit of an advantage since they're such a large and iconic Japanese corporation.
I just think that if the dev doesn't care if they get paid or not then they should offer people back their money. I would assume few people would ask for their money back, but it just seems like the right thing to do. I'm not sure why I'm getting downvoting for suggesting the dev offer refunds. Is offering consumers a choice bad?