It's not pessimistic if it's the likely outcome.
ImplyingImplications
joined 2 years ago
Alright, this is just silly.
So far the only thing they haven't been allowed to show is an image of the prophet Muhammad.
Definitely! That's why I said it's possible non-consenting stuff took place after the video ends. It's entirely possible, but people don't go to jail because it's possible they committed a crime.
I also don't believe that the Crown even argued that consent was revoked. I believe their argument was she was too drunk to consent so what she said in the video doesn't matter. Again, possible, but they couldn't prove that beyond a doubt.
I'm not a lawyer either, but reading the judge's verdict, it sounds like the only evidence the prosecution had was the woman's testimony. The defence had video recordings of the women verbally consenting. Kinda hard to prove beyond a doubt that the woman did not consent when it's on video. Not that some non-consenting stuff didn't happen when the video was turned off but again, a guilty verdict requires no doubt.
That's what the CBC article is about. How sexual assault victims often don't come forward since securing a conviction is incredibly difficult on testimony alone.
It's a Markdown thing. End the line with two spaces.
First line (two spaces) ->
Second line
CTV news is doing live updates on the ruling. The judge is going over evidence that seems to suggest the complainant was sober and consented. No official ruling yet, but I don't think the judge starting off by saying the woman's testimony is not credible leads to a guilty verdict.
Edit: all five ruled not guilty on all charges
Yes, my friends don't support me. Thanks random internet person.
Back in my day, it was only a penny for someone's thoughts!
I'm the only one in my friend group that watches anime and it led to them making lots of pedo jokes at my expense. I'm not a pedo and my friends know that. It's just a running joke. And then they make a joke when someone new is around and everyone needs to explain I'm not actually a pedo...
I still find it crazy. I was watching a show with a friend that displayed where people were from and one guy was from Canada, specifically Alberta. Being Canadian myself, I had the legal requirement to point out another Canadian and said "Hey, that guy's from Alberta!" To which my friend said "I've been to Alberta." I replied "I haven't." That was that. A few minutes later he's scrolling through social media and tells me he's getting a bunch of tourism ads for travelling to Alberta. He thought it was funny but honestly that just creeps me out.
What if we had said something we didn't want everyone to know? What if we were from a country where being gay was illegal, and we mentioned something gay in the presence of a phone, and now we're flagged as gay by these companies. The government then demands consumer information from them and now they have a list of gay people. It sounds paranoid, but the current US government really shows how quickly things can go from being socially acceptable to criteria for being sent to a concentration camp.
Ah yes...that's why I downloaded them too...