ImplyingImplications

Breeding jiu-jitsu

Salvador Allende, President of Chile and leader of the Socialist Party of Chile

From Wikipedia:

On 11 September 1973, the military moved to oust Allende in a coup d'état supported by the CIA, which initially denied the allegations. In 2000, the CIA admitted its role in the 1970 kidnapping of General René Schneider who had refused to use the army to stop Allende's inauguration. Declassified documents released in 2023 showed that US president Richard Nixon, his national security advisor Henry Kissinger, and the United States government, which had branded Allende as a "dangerous" communist, were aware of the military's plans to overthrow Allende's democratically elected government in the days before the coup d'état. As troops surrounded La Moneda Palace, Allende gave his last speech vowing not to resign. Later that day, Allende died by suicide in his office; the exact circumstances of his death are still disputed.

China: lol, lmao

You take out your Suck-It™ and you suck it!

Sigmund Freud has entered the chat

Using English is fine as long as it's to support the Habs rules Quebec Language commission.

an entire section rewritten into raw logical statements

Nobody could misunderstand this!

 ~ A  
 A • B  
 A ∨ ~ C 
 C ⊃ (B ∨ A) 
 ~ (~ B ≡ C) 
 (A ∨ ~B) ≡ (C ⊃ A) 
 [A ∨ ~ (C ∨ B)] 

I ordered a margarita pizza! Where's the margarita!? You're fired!

You forget that like 40% of people in the US are fine with this. It's more depressing when you realize the reason people aren't fighting back is because they're fine with it.

It could hallucinate a citation that never even existed as a fictional case

That's what happened in this case reviewed by Legal Eagle.

The lawyer provided a brief that cited cases that the judge could not find. The judge requested paper copies of the cases and that's when the lawyer handed over some dubious documents. The judge then called the lawyer into the court to ask why he submitted fraudulent cases and why he shouldn't have his law licence revoked. The lawyer fessed up that he asked ChatGPT to write the brief and didn't check the citations. When the judge asked for the cases, the lawyer went back to ask ChatGPT for them, and it generated the cases...but they were clearly not real. So much so that the defendants names would change throughout the case, the judges who ruled on the cases were from different districts, and they were all about a page long when real case rulings tend to be dozens of pages.

I've only ever seen his tweets and people quoting him in articles but watching him speak for 7 minutes is eye opening. I cannot follow a single thing he says. It's just a non-stop stream of consciousness rambling with an occasional "hail hilter" and "I sucked my cousin's dick".

You could probably just say "thank you" over and over. Neural networks aren't traditional programs that exit early for trivial inputs. If you get a traditional program to sort a list, the first thing it'll do is check to see if the input is already sorted and exit if it is. The first thing AI does is convert the list into starting values for variables in a giant equation with billions of variables. Getting an answer requires calculating the entire thing.

Maybe these larger models have some preprocessing of inputs by a traditional program to filter stuff, but seeing as they all seem to need a nuclear power plant and 10,000 GPUs to run, I'm guessing there isn't much optimization.