Quoting the article:
“In rice, the researchers suspect it stems from contaminated soil or agricultural water. Non-stick cookware also often contains the chemicals, or it could be in water used for cooking.”
Quoting the article:
“In rice, the researchers suspect it stems from contaminated soil or agricultural water. Non-stick cookware also often contains the chemicals, or it could be in water used for cooking.”
True but trust is hard to establish in decentralized platforms like the fediverse. As far as I’m aware the only decentralized banking is unfortunately cryptocurrency.
Isn’t that what NFTs do?
Mid journey and the like have already been caught creating shutterstock watermarks in images. Future models might be able to fake specific watermarks well.
I slightly hate myself for suggesting it, but are you essentially describing NFTs?
It’s common enough that tik tok banned the hyperborea hashtag and you can find a couple 4chan threads about it at any time.
I think actually believing in it is pretty fringe even among neo nazis though. It usually involves magic and aliens. It sometimes ties into flat earth and similar nonsense.
You can read a bit more about it here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_Nazism
It’s also a weird neo nazi version of Atlantis. Probably best it wasn’t used.
Almost every time I ask another dev about their preferred styling/formatting, they say they don’t really care as long as it’s all consistent. Automate something like sqlfluff with close to the default settings so you can limit that cognitive load and focus on coding.
Thanks for trying to explain it. I was hung up on thinking all UUIDs looked like UUID v4. I read up a little on UUID v7 and it’s making sense. Probably should’ve done that sooner.
I’ve more of a math background than cs so monotonic is a word I know well but it apparently means something slightly different to me. Monotonicity isn’t mentioned anywhere in that link.
Would they not have monotonic uuids after altering the code in the article to use a function or lambda as they suggested?
By this same logic, someone in 2004-2005 could look back to the crash in the 80s and see they’re at the same level as that peak and a crash is imminent. In fact it was a year or two away and new homes for sale were going to go up another 50% before the crash.
That’s not to say that things looks good. Some sort of correction is probably coming but it could be another year or two or more.