I won't deny that there are some people whose deaths are a net positive. I just don't trust the government to pick them out.
ImADifferentBird
joined 2 years ago
Perhaps we should hook it to a man, woman, person, camera, or TV.
I remember her saying she disliked doing commentary on her podcast, but then, she did it in the "Vince yelling in everybody's ear" era, so maybe she was just sick of that.
How many bets this asshole goes on and on about how people are too easily offended and cancel culture is out of control?
That's because his supporters worship him as a new messiah and cannot conceive of him having actually committed a crime. Or they don't care if he did or not.
I like that Idea. It doesn't entirely solve the problem of political appointees since the lower court judges are themselves appointed, but it does provide a layer of abstraction to where the judge isn't directly beholden to a party, in theory.
They can, but as we can see from Thomas and Alito, they don't.
13 makes the most sense. There are 13 circuits, why not 13 Supreme Court justices?
Of course the CEO is tight with the EVPs.
If that didn't cross the line, one wonders what would.
Seems like, if WBD can't shelve it for a tax write off, they aren't interested.
It is not. They made a specific carve out for the POW/MIA flag, which betrays the true intent of this.