The entire thread of the OG post is gold.
If this AI was so fucking smart why doesn't it just use facial recognition of celebs like RuPaul to wipe out a bunch of false positives?
The entire thread of the OG post is gold.
If this AI was so fucking smart why doesn't it just use facial recognition of celebs like RuPaul to wipe out a bunch of false positives?
Thanks for the info. The Accessible name calculation page is really interesting.
I looked through the beehaw instance and I saw what you had screenshot. You are right. It is not your browser, it is the instance.
Currently they currently on 0.18.4. Infosec.pub is currently on 0.19.3. Maybe that's the issue...
Worldwide, Mario is more recognizable than the mouse. Nintendo is going to start their own movie studio soon. They are copying the blueprint set out by Disney.
https://www.boia.org/blog/should-you-include-alt-text-for-pictures-with-captions
I think their might be something wrong with your browser or something. I tried the code blocks using spaces, tabs, and backticks, and I didn't have the img problem you had.
I also checked from a different account on a different instance on a different browser this post and I can see the link.
I put a link after the quote. That's the source.
Yes you can use both but I've seen some front end developers blank out alt altogether when they are using figcaption.
I did not find this practice in MDN Web Docs but I found it in an other place:
If you’re using an image that has a caption, it may not need alt text if the caption contains all of the relevant visual information.
I was just wondering what Mozilla's method was for finding these images and if they took other things in to consideration like decorative images.
What you quoted is for the feature to add in images to PDFs. It doesn't work for existing PDFs with images already.
In the future, we want to be able to provide an alt text for any existing image in PDFs, except images which just contain text (it’s usually the case for PDFs containing scanned books).
That's how I read it atleaat. I could be wrong.
A couple of months ago, they told the Microsoft sales team that they would not give them the data of their members. I want to know who they are working with to do this.
It is for websites. This is most useful for readers that don't display images. The feature for websites should be added for version 130. I'm on Developer Edition and I am currently on 127. It will be implemented for PDFs in the future after that.
Even in cities like Austin, sidewalks are missing. That's a wheelchair accessibility issue.