IllNess

Never trusted them over the emissions testing thing.

Someone looking to match their golden toilet.

Looking at OP's responses, I think your assumption is correct.

We should get rid of this one illegal immigrant stealing from us.

When OP said chopping board I thought he meant to chop or saw wood on.

I'll take a look. Thanks.

My favorite is Metropolis (1927).

I'll do my research. Thank you for the info.

I wanted to move to the Netherlands because of their biking culture. But citizenship is difficult and I don't speak Dutch.

You can sometimes find your bike in a nearby market for a fee. By a fee I mean they stole it and they are selling it back to you.

So your logic for using Tor is because you can hide a server behind one and people understand the risk. And the only thing that prevents the government from busting people from illegally accessing their own servers is effort.

Why would you suggest using anything that you yourself considers a risk?

But this post is about accessing government servers, which aren't onion servers. Creating servers is irrelevant in this discussion. I'd rather use a service that hasn't failed it's users, which hides IP addresses. When Mullvad got raided, the police couldn't do anything. It was a dead end for them. With Tor, that has been far from the case over and over again.

Several VPNs claim they don't keep logs. I trust Mullvad. Mullvad got raided. The police found nothing.

I trust a trusted VPN over a technology created by the government and that has frequently been broken by them.

Compare the amount of arrest of Mullvad users versus Tor users, logically for me at least, I found my answer. If you trust Tor to access government websites illegally, I say go ahead. I wouldn't.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/11/07/how-did-law-enforcement-break-tor/

FBI kept information to themselves of how they did it and this isn't the first time.

Also I wouldn't trust accessing a site administered by the government on Tor if onion sites can't keep me anonymous.