IMALlama

joined 2 years ago
[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

OnePlus still offers this one on some of their phones.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://dulytek.com/collections/dulytek-rosin-presses

A rosin press is a machine that uses a pair of heated plates to press with enough pressure any cannabis material, such as buds, keif, or hash, which causes the cannabinoids and terpenes to seep out in an oily form called rosin. Rosin gained popularity with its solventless yet easy extraction process.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Warping! Others have hit on a lot of this, so I'll try to be brief.

  • warping is due to the plastic shrinking as it cools. This builds tension in the lower layers of the print
  • bigger prints are naturally more warp prone
  • part shape and aspect ratio also plays a role. Parts with big aspect ratios (eg much wider or longer than the other axis) are more warp prone. Parts with sharp transitions are also more likely to warp
  • different filaments are more warp prone than others. PLA is least prone, followed by PETG. ASA/ABD are the most warp prone I've printed so far
  • fiddling with temps and speeds can help
  • make sure you have good bed adhesion (clean bed, good first layer, etc)
  • having good bed adhesion will only take you so far. I've had prints pull my magnetic bed plate up
  • you can try printing a draft shield around your part (think a skirt as tall as your part)
  • IMO eclosures are the way to go for warp prone parts. You'll need to be somewhat careful about chamber temps getting too high (this can cause nozzle clogs for PLA/PETG) or not getting high enough (ASA/ABS will still warp in a cool chamber). My enclosure has a removable lid that I pop for PLA/PETG and has insulation/bedfans/a filter for ASA/ABS
[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dish soap is better than alcohol, especially if you're cleaning the bed in a sink with lots of water to rinse all the accumulated oils off.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

To save the highlights or for the effect?

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Depending when back in the day ways for you, be prepared for higher prices. On the other hand, the gear these days is great. If you're not going to be shooting fast scenes, most bodies will do nicely. Pick up a sharp prime and you'll be off running. From a purist shooting experience, primes are pretty freeing. A prime will also get the added bonus of primes having good optics and most of them have low night performance.

At your budget, I would suggest used gear. There's nothing wrong with DSLRs if you won't be shooting dynamic scenes, but mirrorless have very nice focusing algorithms these days. Coming from Nikon, I would recommend a D7x00 series body and a prime or three. If you want to go mirrorless, Sony has a very deep back catalog of glass. The A7III is still a great camera and can be had at a pretty good price on the used market, which will leave you with space for a nice lens or two.

I posted this a month ago, but it seems to apply here.

First, the best camera in the world is the one you have on you. Have an urge? Take the photo with what ya got, even if that is your phone. On the other hand, try to be more intentional about bringing your camera with you when you venture into the world. This will probably take finding the right lens and overall package size, but I bring my camera and a compact lens with me on most family activities as a result.

Second, for well lit subjects that aren't moving much and aren't that far away modern cellphones are generally fine. Yeah, a dedicated camera with a fast lens can create a nicer looking background if you're simply sharing photos on the web it's not going to matter a ton. Don't get discouraged if this is the kind of photography you prefer.

A dedicated camera will blow a cellphone out of the water in a couple key areas. Those include:

  • focus speed and control. Even with my old Nikon D40 and D5300 I feel way more confident in my ability to get focus where I want it than either my work iPhone 15 or my personal OnePlus 12. Modern mirrorless are in a league of their own, especially when you pair them with a lens that can keep up with their focusing algorithms
  • the ability to capture sharp photos of things in motion thanks to more light gathering, which lets you use faster shutter speeds
  • low light. I'm shooting full frame these days and with a fast lens I have no problem hand holding and taking photos of human subjects in really low light conditions
  • interchangeable lenses. A long telephoto will give you way better results than a cellphone digitally zooming
  • burst rates. Not all dedicated cameras have nuts frame rates, but a portion do. This makes it really easy to capture the precise moment. Yes, cellphones can do this too but since they're sacrificing light their image quality might not be great

Four examples where I adore my gear:

  1. I am the unofficial team photographer for my kids' youth sports teams. They're both currently doing baseball. I can sit at the end of the backstop fence, about 100 or so feet from home plate, and fill the frame with the kids batting. Thanks to high burst rates I can basically guarantee a photo of the ball hitting and just leaving the bat
  2. We hang out at a lot of museums and go to night events like zoo lights. My gear lets me get great sharp photos, without blur from my family moving around, thanks to a mix of modern camera sensors being fairly low noise, fast glass, and shooting full frame
  3. My older kid did a figure skating show this spring. I rented a 70-200 f/2.8 and was really impressed by the photos it was able to capture. Excellent focusing, kids filling the frame, basically no noise, tack sharp photos
  4. Absolute control over exposure and a very easy shooting experience makes it a lot easier to get cool shots, like panning photos at a racetrack or even a panning shot of my kid on their bike

Happy shooting! If you have questions, make another post!

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There's also all the mess of slicer and printer settings. It would be interesting to give someone a collection of parts with different nozzle sizes, extrusion widths, pressure advance settings, temp settings, print speeds/accelerations, etc

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting project! I will have to give it a look.

sourcing the materials can be a bit of a challenge

Any more details here? I'm guessing the necessary material for electrolytic and what not? Do you know about the boring adjacent stuff like measuring (eg how accurate do the measurements need to be, how precise, etc), disposal, etc?

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure, but I would suspect that AI output would likely be very similar to procedural generation output in that it will need some massaging before it can be used as a final asset.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Procedural generation of content in games is by no means a new thing. Even if the end state isn't completely procedurally generated, odds are a version of the asset was initially and a human touched it up as necessary. When you're talking about large asset sets (open world and/or large maps, tons of textures, lots of weapons, etc) odds are they weren't all 100% hand made. Could you imagine making the topology map and placing things like trees in something like RDR2?

That's not to say all this automation is necessary a good thing. It almost feels like we're slowly chugging through a second industrial revolution, but this time for white collar workers. I know that I tell myself that I would rather spend my time solving problems vs doing "menial" work and have written a ton of automation to remove menial work from my job. I do wonder if problem solving will become at least somewhat menial in the future.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I am a bit sad that the available LEDs are so cool color temperature wise. I haven't bought a new light in years (and years and years). As a longtime EC4SW user, I approve of the form factor and the lack of screw on the tail to get the batteries out. The finish also looks interesting.

But that color temperature... Sigh. Will have to ponder for a bit.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Looks like it's closer to $160 now?

Agree that it's tempting. I wish the LEDs were a bit warmer.

 

I'm going to have to track down a macro lens for my camera body after selling the micro four thirds kit I was using for bees last year.

69
Bath time (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by IMALlama@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world
 

I've seen Robbins around our lawn sprinkler before... I'll have to keep my camera more handy in case they show up again

 

This was about a week or so ago. We're starting to see some bees in the clover now too 🥰

 

Moths need love too!

 

This is a vaguely arty shot I took with my A9ii when I was renting the 70-200 f/2.8.

200mm, f/3.2, ISO 100, 1/800

 

I have a cheap/quick/dirty deer and rabbit fence around our vegetable garden. The doors are simple PVC squares with deer netting that used to attach to the fence via hooks at the top. This design turned out to be very fiddly. The new design seems much easier to manage - simply drop the door section into its slot.

 

/old man

 

So close, and yet so far

 

This is from last august, I just slacked on getting it posted.

I live in SE MI and our bee season hasn't really started yet, but I hope to clear out the remainder of my straggler photos from last year before it starts.

90
Brr (infosec.pub)
 

I took this a few months ago through one of our windows. I have a small backlog of photos to get through and hope to do one a day, but some of them might show up on !photography@lemmy.world.

A9ii w/ Tamron 150-500 @ 374 mm, 1/250, f/5.6, ISO 200. Cropped some.

 

No idea what's going on / it's the first time its flowers have ever looked this way. I personally think it's kind of neat.

 

Title basically. I've found myself playing youth sports team photographer, which I don't mind doing but we're going to have two kids in little league this season and I'm not looking forward to culling two team's worth of games. I've gotten better at framing and catching fielding action over the past year, I get pictures of my own kids, and the rest of the parents on the team seem to appreciate the photos, so woo. But! I'm very interested in tips to make the process of culling shots a bit faster.

Each game I try to get a hero shot per kid batting (getting a hit, bonus points if the ball is in frame), along with some general fielding shots. I come home with a metric crap ton of photos since getting a hero shot basically means bursting any time our team is at bat for every pitch.

I try to make sure each kid has roughly equal representation in the final album, regardless of how many (or few) hits each kid actually got.

I've found that it's easiest to sort photos by kid and cull from there, but I'm doing this completely manually in photo mechanic. I've dabbled in AI tools, but I don't really know what's out there. It seems like sorting all the photos with the most prominent face in the frame, and using context of being mid burst if a face is lost, automatically would be a massive time savings. Does such software exist? I don't want to pull out every face in the frame, just the biggest/sharpest one. Is there a better option for youth sports? A better approach to apply in photo mechanic?

Any/all advice welcome!

view more: next ›