L'enfer c'est les autres.
Hyperreality
joined 2 years ago
The problem arises when facebook links stuff you posted anonymously, with your named account.
I wouldn't get your hopes up.
Andrew Tate is insanely popular in that demographic.
I know, but here's the article of the law firm Musk's retained:
Intellectual property litigation is the firm’s largest practice area and currently has over 200 lawyers who litigate IP cases.[12] Quinn Emanuel represented the Winklevoss twins' social network, ConnectU, in its lawsuit that accused Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg of stealing ideas for his own social network. The parties reached a confidential settlement, yet Quinn Emanuel later revealed the confidential settlement amount of $65 million in a firm advertisement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinn_Emanuel_Urquhart_%26_Sullivan
Sounds like you're suffering from an acute case of 'feels before reals' to me.
Not particularly surprising or shocking that women are less likely to date men who vote conservative. Ignoring the simple fact that the data suggests America is becoming less tolerant of intolerance, and that conservatives are increasingly out of step with majority opinion, the recent abortion thing is a real lady boner killer, as is making excuses for a convicted sex offender.
IRC Musk also fired much of Twitter's legal department. I wouldn't be surprised if meta hired plenty of them too, so they know where the bodies are buried.
This isn't the first time Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan have been involved in proceedings against Zuckerberg. I assume he's more prepared this time around.
But Musk will likely get a settlement out of it. That's simply how the world works. Shit floats.
Also, firefox on android (and I suspect iOS) allows you to install extensions including ad blockers.
Faster, saves battery, prevents sites from breaking on mobile.
Unsure if Karen or drag queen.
Most of the world measures dicks in cms.
I think the big one is car rims and tyres.
You're not entirely wrong, but I have a related degree and actually did polling back in the day, so I'll add some nuance.
Most reputable political polls are surprisingly good. Pollsters get it wrong far far less than people think they do. Which is astonishing, given you're often polling a thousand people, to discover the opinions of millions. The problem is that people fail to read the small print, don't understand basic statistics or probabilities, and media misreport what they actually say.
Best example: 2016 US election. No one who knows a bit about polling was at all surprised by Trump winning. IRC if you aggregated, he had a 1/3 chance of winning. Him winning was invariably within the margin of error of many many polls. But the media misinterpreted them and then blamed bad polling for their own mistakes.
And that's not surprising. Polling how someone will tick a box on an election day in the near future, by asking them to do the equivalent of tick a box in a poll? Likely to be quite good predictor.
More vague stuff like this, it's harder. You're not necessarily measuring what you're measuring, and because the media invariably misrepresents scientific studies and polls, you need to read the small print and what they actually asked.
In any case, here's the pollsters article on it (including sample size, methodology, etc.):
And the questions they asked:
https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/SR_2023.07.10.23_tiktok_topline.pdf
For example, it would have been interesting if they'd asked "Is TikTok a threat to national security in the United States?" rather than "How much of a threat...?"
Changing the answer scale would likely also have resulted in different answers.
Also, do respondents know what national security is? It's a pretty vague term for layman.
Hell, do all respondents know what tiktok is? Because if you asked people if the Umbrella corporation is a threat to national security, it's like that many would answer yes.
Denies there is such a thing as a Ukrainian instance.
Straw man. I never said trans men have no advantage. Keep to the topic at hand, rather than trying to go on a tangent. It's transparent, and many will assume you're doing it because you know you can't win the argument.
Conservative guys complain about women not wanting to date them. People date people they share values with.
Assuming non-conservative women are all 'whores' who sleep around is incel nonsense. If they're choosing not to date conservative men, a large proportion of men, if anything they're being selective. The opposite of being promiscuous. Data also suggests young women have less sex than previous generations. Most sex happens in long term stable relationships.
If you assume the rest of us know what a MAP is, you've likely spent too much time in an echo chamber. It's pretty weird if I'm honest, like if someone mentioned a scientology term and assumed average people knew what they were talking about.
But you're not happy about it, are you? Be honest with yourself. You wouldn't call them whores if you were happy about it. You would live and let live.