Do you have an argument other than a tu quoque?
Hyperreality
joined 2 years ago
I find the timing of this suspicious, given there's rumours the negotiations between the US and SA are in their final stages.
If SA is about to throw Palestine under the bus, as is rumoured, that could explain the timing.
Meh. It's cognitive dissonance and vanity. We're all narcisstic to a certain degree.
We all lie to ourselves that we're good people doing our best. Tell someone they're not, point out the specific ways that they're horrible (because they're human), and they're forced to reconcile these two contradictory pieces of information. Invariably people act emotionally and lash out.
You'll get similar reactions if you criticise people for eating meat, for their role in pollution, buying crap rather than donating to a charity that saves lives, ignoring child labour, etc.
I think we all need to lie to ourselves at least some of the time, or we'd kill ourselves. Lie to yourself too much, and you become president.
Joking aside, we could all do with being a bit more honest with ourselves, so that we can become better people. If you're never honest, you can't grow as a person.
In summary:
-
You don't think American civilians 'had it coming' on 9/11. The reason you don't think they had it coming, is because Bin Laden wasn't Palestinian.
-
You do think Israeli civilians 'have it coming' now, because those murdering them are Palestinian.
-
If Palestians murdered 3000 American civilians, you think 'we could talk' about if that was justified and if they should face consequences ('if any') for that crime.
-
Perhaps predictably, you failed to not mention the holocaust or Hitler.
We're arguably all evil, yeah. If you let a kid drown, you're evil. If you let a kid drown 5000 miles away, because you'd rather buy a pc game or something you don't really need, than donate to charity, that's also evil. If you donate 50 bucks at christmas, to prevent one kid from drowning, that doesn't mean you're not evil if you let another 100 drown during the rest of the year.
People have a really hard time accepting that they're not good. Vanity is the Devil's favourite sin.
But that doesn't mean we shouldn't at least try to be better. It's not because you and I eat meat, that we should also go kick a puppy to death. That puppy does matter. Stop kicking puppies to death!
It’s more of a colloquial term we use in common language.
I know it's not in the DSM and that it's also a colloquial term, but the article cited doesn't use it as such. They're suggesting the prevalence of psychopathy, as diagnosed by the PCL-R test, is 5%.
As the article is the first I found, I used the term psychopathy, rather than using APSD and confusing the terms unnecessarily. They're arguably not synonymous. It's likely that the prevalence of APSD is not the same as that of psychopathy, as diagnosed by the PCL-R.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy_Checklist#Comparison_with_psychiatric_diagnoses
Not in the DSM, I know. Here's the article I took it from after a quick google:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661044/full
Wikipedia suggests that ASPD can be three times more common than 'psychopathy', because they're not entirely the same thing. The two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, which causes confusion. So I used the term used in the article I found, rather than assuming they meant APSD.
TLDR: people who lack empathy are not particularly rare.
He claimed he was defending his fellow arabs.
Would 9/11 have been justified if Bin Laden had been a Palestinian?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/07/30/how-israel-helped-create-hamas/
Not that this justifies terrorists murdering civilians.
Osama Bin Laden:
Terrorism against America deserves to be praised because it was a response to injustice, aimed at forcing America to stop its support for Israel, which kills our people.
Did American civilians 'have it coming' on 9/11?
Do Israeli civilians 'have it coming' now?
Prevalence of psychopathy is estimated at something like 5%. In Russia we're talking at least 7.5 million psychopaths. Add to that those who suffered neglect or abuse and have a lack of empathy, not exactly given Russian history, and I doubt it'd be that hard to find the kind of person willing to rape or murder for a mars bar.
Of course not. Cyberpunk and tech noir usually isn't just about the future, it's arguably about now. More generally, science fiction is often used as a 'safe' way to criticise existing society or say what can't otherwise be said.
Prime example: Tarkovski's science fiction films (Stalker, Solaris, ...), which smuggled very religious themes past the soviet censor, because 'it's only science fiction'.
Make a movie glorifying terrorism? Likely jail sentence and on a list. Make a movie glorifying a terrorist that blows up parliament in a dystopian future? Cult classic.
Make a movie which compares American nationalism to the nazis? You'll never work in Hollywood again. Make it about humans fighting space aliens? Would you like to know more?
Make a movie about how capitalists indoctrinate us all via advertising? You filthy communist! Make a movie about how aliens indoctrinate us all via advertising? They Live, John Carpenter, cult classic.
Make a movie about transitioning? No thanks. Make a movie about freeing yourself from the Matrix with the help of a red pill which looks a lot like the hormone pills the directors used to transition? Become a millionaire.
Make a tv episode where one of the main cast has a sexual relationship with a trans character, who is later forced to undergo gender reaffirming therapy in 1992? Impossible. Make it about Riker having a relationship with an alien who's not androgynous because her race finds gender weird? Prime time tv.
Make a tv programme about the guilt of a Nazi who worked in a camp while the Jews were being exterminated? No way that's happening. Make a tv programme about the guilt of a space alien who worked in a camp while other space aliens were being exterminated? That particular Star Trek episode was broadcast in prime time, to wide acclaim.
For this reason, and on a related note, anyone who complains about a science fiction show or movie being 'too political' is more often than not a moron and/or disingenious.