Even the hypothetical episode 3 draft it ends on a cliffhanger, I'm not sure Half Life can ever have a non cliffhanger ending if even the main writer, freed of all development concerns, writes a cliffhanger ending.
Huldra
Kind of, but he later publicly regretted doing so cause he said that for all the previous HL games, the story was built by him and the dev team in tandem, so it was more like an absolute first draft just by him, and he thought it was unfair that he decided to just abandon their previous collaborative way of working to announce himself as the authoritative voice on Half Life.
There are similarities, but Overwatch bears way more similarity to a MOBA with a wide variety of heroes using hard coded interactions rather than TF2 which uses a smaller selection of classes with variety within the class, who usually have some degree of shared systems and interactions.
TF2 still gets new player tech discoveries due to the design being more open in the classes interacting with the map and each other. The issue kind of is that this is due to TF2 being "antiquated" in having not been designed for competitive professional play, and having been essentially put on maintenance mode, so there are less devs interested in going in and "fixing" things.
No game has convincingly built on the actual foundations of Team Fortress 2 yet, and now even Valve seems to think the design of that game belongs in the dustbin, compared to just trend chasing.
Listen buddy I think Lee Harvey did it cause thats fucking funny as fuck if he did, and all this CIA-Mafia-Exile coalition is like watching the worlds most boring circlejerk, puts me to goddamn sleep.
Curious if this is a case of me having a faulty definition in my head or if people are maliciously misusing a term.
In my mind, a "truther" would be someone who isn't just convinced of an alternative theory on something, but who is aggressively hostile in asserting it and demeaning of anyone who is not on their side.
Like if you think the CIA did JFK, that's not being a truther per se, but if you say shit like "this moron thinks the magic bullet is real" that's some truther shit.
But I'm seeing people use truther for literally just questioning the basic validity of a controversial legal conviction, not even as a matter of "you're a dipshit if you think the court was right" and it feels like just bullying dissenters.
Some discourse on twitter rn about how you can't compare hypothetical retributive community justice to historical lynching because those lynchings were motivated by racism and presumably in the future we will have a post-racist society.
And I feel like if you can just assume post-racism, why wouldn't you assume the future will be post-misogyny, and that there won't be any predators to bring to justice? Can't we have a post-justice society, because all will be just and good by default?
I have to assume this was the perspective of the Iranians, like Israel surely is a little bit of a death cult, who isn't amirite, but they cant be this much of a death cult.
Wow, they really are just like fentanyl.
Genuinely unimaginable, my whole family takes like a week or two to get through an average sized block of cheese just through normal breakfast and snack consumption.
I feel like this is just a funnier variant of compulsively eating like a tub of ice cream to cope, its just modern proliferation of medical language that makes it a "cheese addiction" rather than some annoying neologism like "cheeseaholic"."
Also, it's amazing that they just throw in some quack doctor in the middle of the article to claim that cheese is actually natural fentanyl. Dietary Science either is the fakest field ever or just has the most obscure and ignored legitimate researchers ever, you never hear something reasonable from one of these people its always some shit like this.
Lumpen cesspool of INTJ reactionaries.