Not my content; the article has a vexing system of gatekeeping, so I reposted it here.
HopeOfTheGunblade
joined 2 years ago
Not my content; the article has a vexing system of gatekeeping, so I reposted it here.
I'm aware. I'm not sure what exactly the secret service is going to do about a salvo of hellfire missiles. If the president of the US wants you dead and isn't legally restrained I certainly wouldn't trade places with you.
I'd be pretty surprised if there were a private security option capable of holding off the military, if the president really wanted someone dead and had the legal go-ahead.
I'd be really surprised if Trump could afford them.
Are you aware that you can farm other things than cows, and that alternatives to butter are generally at some point sourced from things that grow?
"Quiet quitting? Oh, do you mean acting my wage?"
What's even worse are the quantum grammar subset of the sovereign citizen set. They have some really weird ideas about language.
"This is entirely out of our control, and if you want an apology, here are the contact details for the person who has the authority to give you one."
It's not an apology if you keep trucking right the fuck on along. You apologize, in part, by fixing the problem. Absent that, it's just empty words. Meaningless.
1.7, 1.6, 1.5.....
Russia funds them, and in at least some cases has kompromat. See: NRA, 2016 us national party hacks.