I think I am against this, for 2 reasons. First, we want to encourage people who can't stand each other to get away from each other, not kill each other. Second, putting this option out there means people will try to use it, whether or not it actually applies.
Halafax
joined 2 years ago
The movie itself.
Neither do feminists. Whatever they claim to be, their actions are always overt misandry. They cannot seem to help themselves be better.
Non-modifiable divorce agreements are fairly common, unfortunately. I had to finish paying spousal support to my ex >WHO WAS IN JAIL FOR MAKING KIDDIE PORN WITH ONE OF OUR CHILDREN<. I even had to pay child support to her until I could get a hearing and have the magistrate adjust the final decree. The family court system hates fathers, it cannot be salvaged at this point.
You can suggest whatever you like, feminists will continue to use "toxic masculinity" because feminists like that it's a misandrist slur with a definition that can't be pinned down. They are hypersensitive to word choice and continue to use this because it a cheap and easy way to disparage men in general and excuse >any< behavior of women.
He makes fun games, but he over-promises beyond his abilities. Ignore the hype, play the game when it’s marked down.
This is interesting, as airlines won't kick boarded passengers off for other passengers (to my knowledge). What's probably happening here is that pilots or attendants need transportation to their next scheduled assignment, for which the airlines will force boarded people off. At that point the airline's computer runs through the passengers and picks whoever paid the least. In this case the attendant was probably trying to solve an impossible problem that the airline created, but saying retarded things (like "you'll get your kids taken from you") in the age of cell phone videos is super stupid. This particular attendant needs to be re-assigned to a empty return flights, they don't have the social skills to handle the job.
The "World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index" is pretty batshit insane. Areas were women have an advantage don't count, so it's just a manipulated answer to a loaded question.
This is what manic phase of a PwBD (person with bipolar disorder) usually looks like. Adobe’s dominance isn’t what it was, but $290k is nothing. Less than nothing. Certainly not enough to code, launch, and support a half dozen professional level apps. I think this is a psychological event instead of a mere scam because of the audacious ridiculousness of the claim.