HK65

joined 1 year ago
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 minutes ago

Who knew that was the good ending

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 19 minutes ago

So here is the problem I think.

In a sane world, you would put up a job ad, 5 people with relevant skills apply, you interview them and select one. If I'm a candidate, I'd have to send in 5 applications to 5 companies, and do an interview with each to find a job.

But then recruiters today won't even start interviewing with 5 candidates applying, they wait until at least like 100, of which they will call in like 20. So the company needs to do 20 interviews, I as an applicant have to do 20 interviews, and write 100 applications on average.

But since most places won't call me in, even if I'm qualified, since they will wait until an arbitrary number of applications and then won't call in everyone qualified, I need to send in as many applications as I can since I need to pay the bills next month, so all companies will receive hundreds of not-really-qualified job applications as well.

Then again, companies want to simplify the problem from their side, so they automate resume checks. This errs on the side of false negatives, since there is barely any cost to filtering out a good candidate versus not filtering out a bad one. Then, when recruiters realise they don't have to check applications by hand anymore, they increase the arbitrary "no interviews under 100 applications" number to 1000 or 2000 or whatever, the more the better, right?

And then add AI checks, AI applications, malicious companies advertising with no actual job just to "check the market", staffing companies making fake applications to flood the market and make it impossible for companies to hire from outside them, and other shit.

You end up with people submitting dozens if not hundreds of applications per day, for months, and they will of course not be able to even keep track of each application and each interview. Imagine you've been ghosted 2000 times over 6 months. Would you make sure you don't do the same to some recruiter that will statistically most likely ghost you anyway? Or fuck off, clear your calendar and be happy that you're done with this shit?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 6 points 39 minutes ago

Does the bill create a requirement to post the hiring wage range so as not to waste everyone’s time?

Hey, we're going to have that in the EU starting next year

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Problem is that the EU industry is profiting off Vucic big time. It was the same with Orbán, but now it's everyone's problem so the EU gave us a chance to get rid of him.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I know. What I'm saying is that your experience isn't universal.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 hours ago

I have a feeling that this might not be the best economic system ever

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 40 points 4 hours ago (12 children)

This morning, the BLS released its monthly jobs report, showing that the economy added just 73,000 new jobs last month—well below the 104,000 that forecasters had expected—and that unemployment rose slightly, to 4.2 percent.

How fucked is that if you think about it. There are more jobs, but less employed people? I know the answer is that pay is so low, many people hold multiple jobs, but touting this as an achievement is perverse.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

People are on Windows because of inertia.

If you look at just PC gaming, Steam charts show that the big competitive kernel-level AC titles are way down, the biggest one is the newest Rainbow 6, with 80k players of the 36 million people active on Steam right now, 10 million being in-game. Funny thing is, the biggest Steam title is indeed a competitive online shooter, CS2, but it runs fine on Linux.

If it was competitive gaming that was the only reason people aren't on Linux, most other segments would have seen a mass migration already. Competitive games can't explain why 95%+ of the community is not on Linux.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 hours ago

The housing crisis hits them hardest. The lack of entry level jobs and the abysmal nature of entry level pay. The state of education, particularly higher education. The lack of representation itself.

Who is campaigning on bringing house prices down? On forcing higher wages and better conditions on entry-level jobs, and forcing companies not to eliminate entry-level jobs en masse with AI? Affordable quality education?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 24 points 4 hours ago

I thought that the US charging people with terrorism willy-nilly was already par for the course

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Vucic will throw as many people under the bus as he needs to to cling to power.

 

Hey, these photos were taken in Hungary today, aerial refueling of F/A-18E Super Hornets as seen from the ground.

And here are some extra courtesy of the same guy, from his friend who works as a refueling tech.

 

The POV presented in the article is one POV in Hungary, the country is divided on the issue but mostly does not care beyond a small minority.

People cite the band shouting "Up Hamas, up Hezbollah" on this concert as justification for the ban.

 

I know it's not the best source, but all the relevant news from outlets that are not outright Russian disinfo are only in Hungarian.

These are trusted, well read and researched articles in Hungarian if you want to check:

https://hu.euronews.com/2025/07/19/a-hiresztelesekkel-ellentetben-nem-egett-le-a-karpataljai-templom-es-a-gyujtogatot-is-elfo

https://telex.hu/kulfold/2025/07/20/ukrajna-karpatalja-elozetes-letartoztatas-rongalas-templom

 

Leaders such as Trump and Orbán could only be effectively opposed, she said, by ditching a “legalistic, technical, technocratic approach” in favor of “something for the electorate to be excited about”.

 

Edit:
Internal headline on the page:
The 'strongman' PM who inspired Trump's playbook - but now finds his power crumbling

Headline from metadata and BBC's search is the one in the title.

Edit2: Changed headline to the apparently new one.

 

Length: 1:39:20

Immigrants, populism, border fences, electoral autocracy.

If you are interested about how and why Hungary is as it is, this is a documentary just released by Partizán, the most viewed Hungarian news outlet independent from the Hungarian government.

The subtitles are not autogenerated but hand-made by the news outlet.

The outlet has a decidedly leftist slant even by European standards, but are considered mainstream in Hungary.

 

So creating a new repo on GitHub, you get a set of getting started steps. They changed the default branchname to "main" from "master" due to its connotations with slavery.

When I create a new repo now, the initial getting started steps recommend creating a branch named "master" as opposed to "main" as it was a while ago.

It's especially weird since the line git branch -M master is completely unnecessary, since git init still sets you up with a "master" branch.

Disclaimer: I have a bunch of private repos, and my default branchnames are pretty much all "master".

Is this a recent change?

Edit: Mystery solved, my default branchname is "master". Thanks bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone !

 

I mean, he's not wrong, but apparently saying the quiet part out loud became a faux pas in Hungary recently.

It's not as pithy as Orbán's "Rosatom will buy it for me" about RTL Hungary though.

Archive link

view more: next ›