What? What's narcissistic about that comment. Abuse -- maybe since that was antagonistic language and it just might be your first day on the internet.
GunnarRunnar
joined 2 years ago
Talking about finger pointing without actually breaking down their argument doesn't seem constructive and makes you sound like op hit home with their description.
By being filthy rich and owning a lot of the company?
Yeah too bad that idiot at the top hasn't been thrown out like in any normal company and the company is using resources to accommodate his whims.
It's called self-deprecating humor.
Bitching about people switching to more dangerous substances makes the case to legalize it, nothing more.
How is it ridiculous because like you yourself said they are offering an opinion on the products? And that wasn't the only point they had, it was just one of many and valid criticism.
And it's dumb to call that sloppy editing when the narrative they were trying to build was that they're more trustworthy than other outlets providing same kind of reviews. And that doesn't seem to be the case.
It's hard to trust a face with a mouth agape.
I wonder if it's as simple as just slowing down the input reading to a human reaction time level. At least my screen seems to take 15 000 inputs at the same time when wet.
Make some kind of bet between you two. Like offer a nice dinner if you can save some money when going carless. And offer something in return if it's actually more expensive, too.
Talk also about the convenience factor etc, those all matter.
So that's why Elon Musk made those scientists invent a flamethrower.
Lmao thought police is fucking sending me a bill for breaking the copyright law!!