Can't read the articles? Can't even read step 1 on a list!
GreyEyedGhost
joined 2 years ago
Lol this is the typical takeaway. A better result would be to not engage in illegal practices and then it doesn't matter if you put it in writing, but that's not how you become a billionaire.
Well, I could counter that point, which I already said was valid, but I already gave those points and you completely ignored them. Continue as you are, I'm sure it gives some relief from any feelings of responsibility for your actions and the carbon emitted to allow it.
I used to play on my PC, and have used kb+m and HOTAS. I mostly play on the Steam Deck now, and with a few tweaks have been able to get everything up and running pretty much the way I like. All 3 have pluses and minuses.
HOTAS feels pretty great, especially after you get everything set up just right. I found it clunky for on foot, but that may have been more experience than everything else. It felt good enough that I really considered HOSAS, but that's another expense I wasn't willing to invest in. HOSAS flying can be truly amazing.
KB+M is pretty flexible, and the conversion from in ship to on foot is seamless. The biggest downside is remembering the dozens of keys you've bound to various functions, and the slight differences between in ship, in SRV, and on foot.
The Steam Deck is a little worse than the other two options, but it's so convenient. It's supported in game, so hints show your controller binds, which helps a lot. The default graphics leave text a little fuzzy, but switching the anti-alias from the default fixes this (I can find it later if need be). You will need button combos to do everything you need to, but, hints. Your deck will sound like a jet the whole time (so does my computer). I find the dual 2-axis joysticks a better experience than KB+M for flying, but not quite as good as a 3-axis joystick and throttle. I don't really use the tactile pads for anything but keyboard entry, which could be smoother. I rarely use the touch screen feature as well.
I'm not sure if Elite has controller support, but I think it does. If you have a controller as capable as the Steam Deck, it's definitely an option.
If the tariffs get high enough, it will just mean more American oil will be used domestically.
The very graph you posted indicates that the US needs to reduce their CO2 emissions by 1/3 to meet the per capita emissions of China, and a good part of China's energy consumption is producing goods that are used around the world. Their ratio of renewables to fossil is also increasing. Yes, that isn't helping climate change, and yes, it is improving the state of things for Chinese people, but don't pretend that a lot of this industry isn't directly driven by the lifestyles of people in the developed world.
It's easy to point fingers at them for doing what the developed world has been doing for most of the last 200 years.
Regionally dependent, typically based on the weather, terrain, and how populated the area is. In cold places with more than 16 feet to bedrock, you will typically have basements because they're cheaper to heat in the winter and cool in the summer. If the bedrock or the water table is close to the surface, basements are too expensive or impossible. If there is lots of space around you and it isn't too cold, you won't have basements because they cost more per square foot than building on the surface. If you're densely populated (and don't have the exclusion conditions listed above), you will likely have a basements because it costs less to have a second floor (above or below) than it does to buy more land.
In short, bungalows have basements where it's more cost-effective than having a bigger bungalow.
I think you can attribute that to the people MS bought DOS from. Don't ask me their names, because...
Yes, but if you increase the funding, they will say "Why is science so expensive?"
At this point, this clip is the entirety of the debate that I've seen, but I will say two things about this general issue.
If your argument is that his opponents are doing shitty things so it's okay if he does shitty things, take a look through history or south of our border to see how that ends up. And I've never seen Pierre give a real alternative to any issue he's identified, whether those issues are real or not. The few stances he's taken are usually tired conservative agendas that have failed every time they've been tried, yet he drags their mummified remains onto the stage, dusts them off, and pretends that it's a novel idea that will solve the issue it's targeted at with a single step. Mandatory minimum sentencing? This is a primarily punitive measure that ignores the main issues with our prison system, that it is overloaded by people who have little hope for a better future and few options besides crime for anything but the most meager of existences. But sure, longer sentences will fix that. No? Well, at least it's something that can happen in one term. And that's representative of every 'idea' he puts forward. An alternative whose only merit is the thinnest veneer of emotional relief to charged topics and not enough depth or nuance to actually address the problem, let alone solve it.
Every accusation is a confession...
Seriously, probably meant to say gagged, and failed miserably. I still think it's a shit excuse.
And where is the cowlick on there...