GreyEyedGhost

He's a terrible person, but this is kind of stupid. I stumble going upstairs, and have for years. Not every day, no, but neither has Trump. So far.

The difficulty walking down a ramp in his first term was far more damning, imo, and he's still around.

To add to this, the changes to take this to the next level: raise the dress so the front horizontal strap is even with the bottom of the breasts, tighten up the straps to match that new position, and take the dress in along the line where the horizontal strap is located so it is fitted, but not snug. I think that will get you closer to the intended look for that dress. I would say you're looking for the same level of fitting as in the second link you provided, but even the first one looks a little more fitted than OP's.

They are a better source than anything you've provided, yes.

You're right, Wikipedia is a terrible primary source, because it isn't a primary source. So, while you should never reference it in a paper or dissertation, the sources it references are perfectly valid. The good news is, I'm not writing an essay or dissertation, and I don't have to follow the correct rules for those. I did you the favor of clicking two links deeper (it took about a minute) and finding the information where they talk about all those cases that the judges totally threw so they could force you to pay illegal taxes. Now, I can't make you turn that link purple, but if you do you might get the other side of that argument that you apparently haven't stumbled across in your decades of examination. Good luck.

Sorry, saw your response just after I had posted the same in response to his comment.

There is no historical agreement that the earth is round, but guess what?

When the second argument that is listed in Wikipedia is that Ohio doesn't count when it had been a state for over a century before the amendment was proposed, I start to think these arguments are specious at best. It seems every judge the case had gone before agreed with that stance, which also sounds like historical agreement to me. Given the amendment was proposed due to the Supreme Court overturning income tax as unconstitutional, it also appears the courts were more than willing to rule against income tax prior to this supposedly dubious amendment.

Do you have any evidence that is stronger than the Obama birther conspiracies?

What do you mean by questionable circumstances?

Frankly, if you're looking at the morality of eating meat, this is as good a stance as any.

Space is almost free, and it's a good cue to what you're going to find. It's how I tell my PerfectDark posts apart.

And I guess a bunch of men shouting and banging on tables is the height of civilization

The only way your point makes any sense is if you think British cultural history is more important than Maori cultural history.

You say that, but when I searched "politician brawl" in the last year, I got Illinois, Turkey, Serbia, Georgia (the country), Italy, Brazil, and Argentina. Now not all of those were in the legislative chamber. One was at a board meeting (Illinois mayor), and i think a couple others might have been, out of chambers, too. But at least half of those were in chambers. In the last year. And this isn't even counting the Swedish politician who shot someone, which was at his home.

And you will have to explain how someone doing a traditional dance of political relevance is any less culturally significant than the filibuster.

Came here through your post about the motor brake. It looks janky as he'll, but also very functional. The only suggestion I would give is a shroud on the belt so people don't make mistakes that cost fingers.