So last year.
GreyEyedGhost
joined 2 years ago
So, criminally negligent.
You missed the part where they literally coordinated with the IDF on their trip, didn't you? The only reasons this could happen are intentional or criminal negligence. Given how well this fits with the trends, it's hard to imagine it was negligence.
Well, the random sampling makes it less likely it's invalid. Random sampling is pretty much the standard for large groups. As for significance, that's something I'd have to read more to know whether it's high enough to truly matter. There are very well developed rules for this stuff in statistics.
Read the book Whipping Star. It isn't very long. If you get to the end and can't see the corollary, I'd be happy to point them out to you.
I also think prisoners should be treated humanely, and wonder why people think if we treat criminals like animals they will stop behaving like animals.
Trump thought the day the Twin Towers fell was a good time to mention his property was closer to the tallest building in New York. That very evening, on the news, in 2001. Here's a link.
I started work at a place, and heard a story of a lady who caught two guys in the women's showers the day before. I don't think a sign on the door is going to change much, certainly not after that day.
If you don't live alone in the woods in a house you built yourself off the food you caught or grew in the clothes you made, you're surviving on the support of others to one degree or another. We call it civilization. Moreover, these are kids, who had no choice in their birth. And finally, study after study has found a net economic benefit in making sure kids are fed enough to learn, so it is less of a burden than just letting kids starve.
So what's your reason for preferring to see kids go hungry?
Yeah, it was fun reading about that war/liquor bootlegging enterprise.
Further polluting the environment isn't going to solve our problems!
Hopefully that works. Enjoy the eclipse!