It would be useful to know the title of the book so I can easily remove it. Excluding the title of the book from this article is not reducing the risk of radicalization.
Why don’t they name the book?
two to power of four = 16
I think twatgate would be more appropriate
It sounds like you are trying to start a pyramid scheme 😅
Firearms decrease your safety in any but the most dire situation
This doesn’t have to be the case. Guns can be safe with proper regulation and enforcement.
it is a tool made for specifically one thing. To pierce the skin and rip through the inner organs of a person.
This isn’t true. I live in a country with sensible gun control laws and live on a rural property with 10 acres of forest. We have a small rifle to protect the wildlife against rabies or to put down an injured animal.
The US conversation around guns is toxic.
How dare you be helpful!
I’m not sure, I feel like Canada should be strengthening trade relationships with other countries.
I’m hoping for 100% tariffs on US Teslas and removing the current tariffs on Chinese EVs.
I appreciate the intent but who cares what the people that planted this book want, lets focus on reducing radicalization. I'm not sure how informing folks about what books to look out for is going to increase radicalization. The argument that it might cause copy-cat incidents doesn't really make any sense, it's not like people are getting radicalized by reading CBC articles, they're getting radicalized on social media. And I guarantee the title of this book is freely spreading in those toxic circles.