Gray

joined 2 years ago
[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeahhh, that one doesn't really play into the rest of what I said 😅 That's just nostalgia. It's hard to argue that Google Maps hasn't made our lives easier in just about every way we use it unlike the other tech I mentioned...

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Every time a new technology comes out we think it's going to make our lives so much more simple, but what really happens is the expectations of what we should be capable of doing increase and as a result we take on more responsibilities. One example is cars. You can travel further now, right? Only, now it's normal to drive an hour to commute to work. Or now you have a wider area of travel you're expected to make to visit people you know.

My boomer opinion is that smartphones have done this in a big way. I'm expected now to be available 24/7 to respond to texts on a moments notice. Not responding looks rude. I've been in workplaces that had a culture of checking work messages on Teams on cellphones outside of hours (which I refuse to do). My friends will have long group messages that I'm expected to keep up with. All of this responsibility adds up to more stress than we had in a pre cellphone era. And that hasn't translated to better lives for us in the end. There are advantages and I appreciate many of the things our high tech era gives us. But part of me longs for that era where we just had to trust that people would show up to get togethers at the agreed upon times. When conversations were special because we didn't just have 24/7 access to each other. Where we had to decipher maps to take road trips. Where we were more present with each other. I was born in the 90's which puts me in a strange generation of people that only kind of remember what it was like before.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Do you think "instance" is a bad word to use for the different Lemmy servers? My wife thinks so, but I'm not sure what a better word would be to use other than maybe just "server", but that also feels too techy. I do think "community" is a good non-technical word to use for the equivalent of subreddits.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

With the Fediverse slowly gaining steam, I've been thinking a lot about the structural problems with the big social media platforms of old. I really feel like we set ourselves up for this outcome. Of course Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit were going to let us down sooner or later. We placed our trust in private centralized companies to stay good on their ethics. The moment money even entered the discourse in those spaces, they were doomed to become what they are now. I really hope Lemmy and Mastodon and Frendica and Peertube and the other Fediverse platforms can gain popularity. We have a real chance here to build social media from the ground up, but this time with the long term ethics in mind. I really think this decentralized structure can allow us to keep more transparency and allow for smaller feeling communities to thrive without being subject to tyrannical administration.

Edit: Corrected "momey" to "money". Really sounded like a weird fetish there, I am sorry. Momey is not entering the discourse in any spaces, thank you very much.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think drama in any moderated forum is inevitable unfortunately. This is especially the case for a decentralized platform like Lemmy, where every instance has its own moderators that can stir up drama with their banning/post removal practices. But Lemmy is also uniquely positioned to deal with this by having so many alternate instances to jump to if you come to disagree with one's policies. There's also defederation as the nuclear option if all else fails, which at least means that instances aren't obligated to stick together. It does probably mean that down the line there will be several separate "universes" of Lemmy that have stuck together because of similar moderation practices. In the meantime I think all we can ask for is that instances be very explicitly clear on their rules to avoid drama as much as possible.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

How dare you accuse society of having injustices! You will be happy with our inequalities whether you like it or not, peon!

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't think the article mentions it, but one of my favorite weird facts is that a greater consumption of caffeinated beverages has been proven to reduce your risk of Parkinson's Disease.

Link to study.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My wife and I moved from Colorado to Ontario a year or so ago. One of the (many) reasons we had discussed was to get away from the smoke from fires. My wife is very sensitive to it. This week has really proven to us that there is no "escaping" climate change. It was foolish for us to have placed any credence into the misconception that the colder, wetter climate of Ontario makes us any less vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. It was even more ironic that of all the weeks my wife could have chosen to travel to Ottawa for a conference, she chose the week that Ottawa was particularly affected by the smoke.

I really hope that this week's fires are a wakeup call to people living on the eastern side of North America. When we originally moved to Colorado, it was striking to me how much more climate conscious people were there than places we had lived before to the east. But that's just how it is. You get battered by these fires or floods or hurricanes or whatever over and over and over again and it begins to force everyone in an area to wake up to what's happening. Nobody can hide from it anymore. I just hope that it starts to sink in deeper into the psyches of those who can make real change happen.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This seems to be a really common mistake some people make. Like when Pelosi tried to punish Ilhan Omar in the US House of Representatives for "antisemitism" when Ilhan was critical of the Israeli government. I can't tell if these people genuinely can't differentiate between racism and criticism of national governments or if this is a sinister misuse of racism to censor opinions they disagree with. My inclinations are towards the latter unfortunately.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you for calling this out. I also noticed it in the modlogs a few minutes into using my account. I find it extremely concerning that mods in the largest Lemmy instance are removing articles even slightly critical of China. And it was on the World News page. This kind of censorship so early on this platform isn't great and we should call it out when we see it so that we can flock to more trustworthy communities on Lemmy.

With that said, this makes me pretty happy that Lemmy is federated. My ability to seek out instances with mods that don't have tendencies towards censoring opinions is comforting. And furthermore, I think it's really cool that we can all see the modlogs like that. It's a pretty good check on power hungry moderators.

view more: ‹ prev next ›