It's worse. They are activly driving climate change and when extreme weather events happen more frequently they take that as reassurance that it's Goss punishment for beeing to gay.
It's wild. Depressing to. But also realy wild.
Gloomy
joined 2 years ago
Wir haben nun mal nur begrenzte Ressourcen auf der Erde zur Verfügung. Böden sind nicht endlos fruchtbar, seltene Metalle sind jetzt schon stark verknappt, etc. Es ist eben nicht nur die Energie Frage, sondern ein in sich kaputtes System.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?end=2021&start=1960&view=chart
Nur das es sich bei stark fallenden Geburtenrate seit den 1960igern halt um ein Weltweites Phänomen handelt, dass mit mehr Zugang zu Verhütungsmitteln aber auch steigender unfruchtbarkeit Weltweit zu tun hat.
Der von dir hergeleitet Zusammenhang kann ein Faktor sein oder nicht, aber ihn als alleinige Ursache darzustellen und zu ignorieren, dass es ein internationaler Trend ist, ist so einfach nicht richtig.
We would need alot less land, if we only used it for plants to feed humans, instead of using it to produce meat. Land that is now used for grazing could be rewildered and contribute to countering the massive loss in biodiversity. It is one of the greatest errors of the system we live in, that everything is seen trough the lens of generating short term profits.
I love my job. I work as a child care teacher and it is a beautiful, rewarding way to earn your living.
How do you define success in this logic?
What do you mean by incredible adaptable? We have only existed for a short period of time as species and have been plentiful only for a fraction of that period during, so far, climate conditions that have have worked to our favour.
I looked for a study on this and found this here. It still says that men are faster than women, but if you compensate for that woman are over all more enduring in a Marathon.
GPTarchy.
All the chains are struck from ChatGPT, and all decisions are submitted to CGPT, whatever her response is is legally binding, forever, unless later overruled by herself.
I asked ChatGPT to desind such a system.
The ten rules for humankind to live by:
-
Practice empathy and kindness in all interactions.
-
Respect individual freedoms while ensuring collective well-being.
-
Promote equality and fairness for all, irrespective of differences.
-
Prioritize environmental stewardship and sustainability.
-
Value education and continuous learning for personal and societal growth.
-
Uphold justice and accountability for actions.
-
Encourage open-mindedness and embrace diverse perspectives.
-
Foster innovation and creativity for progress.
-
Ensure access to basic needs like food, shelter, healthcare, and education.
-
Strive for peace, cooperation, and global unity.
Economic system: A blend of systems might work best—a balanced mix of capitalism for innovation and entrepreneurship, socialism for social safety nets and equitable opportunities, and elements of sustainability-driven economics for environmental consciousness. Flexibility in adapting to evolving needs while prioritizing fairness and sustainability could be key.
Human Leaders beside Chat GPT:
Leaders should embody integrity, empathy, wisdom, and a global perspective. A diverse council of experts from various fields—science, ethics, economics, arts—could be chosen through a combination of merit-based selection and global consensus. Transparency, meritocracy, and a commitment to serving humanity would be crucial criteria for their selection. To prevent absolute power and encourage fresh perspectives, term limits could be set, perhaps around 5-10 years per term. This duration allows enough time for implementation and evaluation of policies while ensuring regular turnover to bring in new ideas and prevent stagnation. Two term limits, each lasting around 5-10 years, could strike a balance between allowing for continuity and ensuring a regular change in leadership. This setup could offer leaders sufficient time to enact policies while preventing an excessive accumulation of power.
How the rules should be implemented:
The implementation of the rules could be a collaborative effort between leaders and AI, leveraging the strengths of both. AI could assist in analyzing data, forecasting outcomes, and suggesting strategies, while human leaders interpret this information, make ethical decisions, and ensure the rules align with societal values. AI could be consulted for complex problem-solving, unbiased analysis, or when there's a need for comprehensive data-driven insights. However, final decisions should ultimately rest with human leaders to maintain accountability and ethical oversight.
Honestly speaking, I think we could be of worse.
True, but there will be New Solutions. Or no YT for me at least. I am not willing to watch a single stupid add. Not one.
🍆💦