No, the person is right. It's realy fucked up to eat and kill another sentient beeing to feed yourself, if your could just as easy not do so.
So you think grass and cows are comparable here? I'd be careful to judge others people's intelligence if I where you.
Monculture only convert about half the Co2 that a real forest would.
So ne online Umfrage ist natürlich niemals repräsentativ und selbstverständlich auch manipuliert. Außer sie geht ums Gendern. Dann kann man sie sogar benutzen um unnötige Verbote damit zu rechtfertigen.
Krisenmanagement
Well I guess this explains the whole best or random man on the woods thing.
More like Captain Planet
That would be cruel to the people hit by a natural Desaster, people that might not be on board with this law at all.
Further it would just give the right wings nuts a reason to point to how evil Democrats are.
I instead propose to create a safety fund on the federal level that can be used to support states hit by natural Desaster. Just call it something realy obvious, like the "Climate Change Damge Mitigation Fund". Make it a requirement that states publicly announce how much money they are asking for from said fund.
Boost
After reading the comment again: yeah, you are right, I missed the point.
Unless of course you are suggesting that the generation viewing TikTok and YT are as vapid and shallow as the content they prefer?
No, not what I was suggesting at all.
To be fair, many Youtuber and Tiktokers that are watched alternatively by younger people aren't intellectual powerhouses presenting super complex content. Not that it's not there, I have a couple of more informative-ish chanels I like to watch, but there is nothing intellectual challenging watching a video about the speedrun history of kings quest IV.
Here is an article that shows some contra points to the theorie, in case you want to have a look at that too.
The evidence for it is rather shallow, realy.