GivingEuropeASpook

joined 2 years ago
[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

A few thousand saved up because of government programs and policies that have now largely expired isn't gonna net you a house anywhere in the US afaik.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

What nooo you're supposed to hate trans people enough to sacrifice personal freedoms and liberty!

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

IDK, if she lives in one of these authoritarian right wing regimes in the US, the company might not have a choice.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm sorry to put you on a spotlight, but your situation is precisely what I was thinking about when I made my comment. Not queer or some woke SJW warrior. You're just a person trying to live his life, and I have to imagine that a State Law banning you from putting them in anything official or public would be similarly frustrating.

But the thing is, you're just collateral damage at best to the GOP, and speaking from experience, at worst the target of ire simply for creating such confusion in other people for merely having an ambiguous name, I assume.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Yes, and it's actually appreciated by many trans and nonbinary people, because it normalises the concept.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Personally, i am all in for that.

I really don't think you are, because most people don't realize how broad things will get. While right now, the targets are trans and gay people, people who write and pass these sorts of laws don't want to stop there. When I said "deviations", I wasn't just speaking about 'us queers', but also about men with long hair, women with flat chests, literally anyone who doesn't mould themselves into the right wing's view of "Man" and "Woman". I don't think you want the colour of your shirts policed, or for cops to come in and throw a woman out of the restroom because she wasn't "feminine" enough to someone.

I really don’t give 2 shits if you’re trans or gay or whatever. Just keep it in front of you. No need to put your pronouns in your name, or put a trans flag everywhere.

If you don't care, then why does it bother you so much to see them merely existing in public or online?

I'd like to suggest that you ignore pronouns or pride flags since they clearly don't appeal to you, but like many things in life, what doesn't matter to you might matter to one of the other 7 billion or so human beings on the planet with you, and putting the pronouns in the bio or displaying a pride flag actively communicates safety and creates a welcoming atmosphere, while also helping us find like-minded people and make friendships.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Not really harmless tho, i’ve seen countless places turn into a trans circlejerk.

What exactly would that even be? "hnghh, we respect other people's choices and individuality, hngggh" How awful. All we want is to have the same respect and autonomy granted to straight and/or cis people to be granted to us.

As for the “caring” part, I don’t care whatever you are, just don’t mention it.

And that's harmful because unless you truly are consistent and also don't want men to mention their girlfriends or wives and for women to never mention their boyfriends or husbands around you, you're treating people differently based on their gender or sexuality, allowing someone to talk about their home life, what they may have done over the weekend with their partner, but only if it ain't gay or trans.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Bourgeois governments gonna bourgeois

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ok, if you are a middle class parent with a little bit of savings, and one of your child wants to buy a house, wouldn’t you do everything you can with your money to help them too?

The point is that less and less people are in this position. Middle class parents with savings? What is this, 1985?

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago (11 children)

God, if only people could just like pool their resources together to build homes or something...

We could even call it something like "social housing," and have it be a publically regulated service instead of treating housing as some sort of game of investment for the wealthy? No no, totally impossible...

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah same, only like half of the videos load or play.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly, and Mastodon had been kinda gunning for Twitter for years before Elon went full Elon, so they were primed for the influx. Lemmy I think expected to have years to go before it's userbase would similarly skyrocket.

view more: ‹ prev next ›