GarbageShootAlt2

joined 2 years ago
[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

If the admins have a laissez faire approach, then they can go fuck themselves. The difference between a nuke and defederation (well, there are many, but the main one here) is that defederation can be undone. If the admins don't like their instance being isolated, they can fix the problem by getting rid of the comm. If they are that committed to allowing the comm, then it is correct to keep them defederated.

The one caveat I will give is that it would be incumbent on the other instances to follow through on overturning the blacklist -- and making sure their peer instances do -- if shitjustworks actually does comply eventually.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

It had a massive impact on the "culture" of the website and would have kept spreading quite effectively if the admins weren't pressured to quarantine it for PR reasons.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Actively purging communities of reactionaries is pretty important and the hands-off attitude that some Free Speech Warriors inherited from Reddit advocate for is only going to spread reaction. If they care so much about Free Speech, they can go back to their pedophile website and talk about how r/jailbait needed to be kept up for the sake of free speech.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

If it's supporting some shitheel Republican's cult of personality and names itself after the most infamous online instance of the cult of that shitheel, it doesn't need to be given benefit of the doubt. If it's some wholesome uwu satire, then it can bear that fucking cross and negotiate being removed from blacklists.

A Hilldawg 2024 instance should be treated in just the same way, before some stupid American asks.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Nazis shouldn't be able to do what they want on their own instances either, they should be crushed there as they should in every space

But also blacklisting is a basic first step that everyone should do, so you aren't wrong there.

In defense of some instance admins, I think they can just literally not know because it's hard to keep tabs on every instance that gets made, but that also means that, if you use that instance, you should totally DM them to let them know (I've had to do this with certain other instances). If the admins persistently ignore those warnings, they should be treated as complicit.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Who gave you the opinion that the PRC is less of a democracy than India?

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

PRC still has very slightly more, as far as I can tell. About 20 million more, 1.40something billion vs 1.42something billion.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Telling people not to use a word, whatever might be said about it being a good idea or not, is not fascism. "Fascism" is a specific social phenomenon that has emerged from the decay of capitalism as reactionary popular movements that seek to offload their poverty onto social minorities. "Taboo words" have existed for about as long as language has existed for an endless variety of reasons. Whether having some words be taboo is good or bad, calling it fascism is completely ridiculous.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It is a foolish path, but to call it "oppressive" is to tip your hand that you have no real notion of what oppression is if you're worried about what amounts to a slightly different set of etiquette on a semi-anonymous internet forum.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

This is ridiculous. "Politics" cannot be in the driver's seat because "politics" is not an entity. Domestic capital legally falls under the jurisdiction of the government, but that does not mean that it is actually at the mercy of the government. Capital since before the country was even founded has owned the vast majority of politicians and dictated the way that the government is organized and the laws it passes. That's why people without land couldn't even vote at first and why we still retain a senate, which is 100% just a body for checking the power of people who do not own land versus those who own a lot of land.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Speaking as a Marxist, this is false. Capitalism was once the historical progressive force against feudalism. This was already waning two centuries ago, but it was not always true.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

That's an easy one, conservatism came first because it preceded the founding of the US and was championed by many in the Continental Congress.

view more: ‹ prev next ›