Ganbat

An article about AI... which is tech... removed for not being about tech...

Yeah, PTB.

Dan and Arin got ahold of one of those vibratora on a recent Ten Minute Power Hour. Kinda frightening tbh.

I find it weird as fuck how harshly skeptics are treated

It's reactionary, they'll get trolled to hell otherwise.

I moderate a community on Reddit which allowed AI posts. Until recently, the community got less than one AI post per month. Regardless, every post would get an onslaught of hateful comments and false reports full of curses.

Recently, the subreddit got a few more AI images than usual. Less than a third of the posts over the last month before I personally removed multiple of them for quality reasons. The accepted consensus between commenters, however, was the opposite of this reality.

Not to say the actions of this mod were correct, in fact it seems ridiculous. This is just to answer why they would be harsh.

You replied to the wrong person methinks.

The issue is that people are not willing to pay the price that matches demand.

Uh... doesn't that just mean that the price doesn't match demand?

I guess maybe it's just too blatant to ignore at this point. I mean, Elon says, "Hey, made Grok better, got rid of the LEfTiSt BIaS!" And immediately Grok goes, "So hey, Hitler really knew how to deal with those Jews, huh?" Can't even pretend at this point.

All the chuff, none of the nuance. As I stated, and as others have stated, the point isn't whether the NWS did or did not do something at all, it's that what they did do, they did wrong. Very wrong. They're still getting it wrong.

Flooding is common in Texas, and is generally a minor hazard. That's how it was reported. That's not what happened. That is the valid criticism that you're intentionally disregarding.

And this is what you do. I've seen other comments of yours. Time and time again, you try to play "devil's advocate," but you do so by disregarding any arguments that don't align with right-wing talking points. Anything you can't refute, you subtly push aside, trying to bury it within these little nonsensical attacks.

bald with beard meter

Okay, I'll just respond factually, then.

They're only right from a surface-level examination. The context of my own comment, the comment that you replied to, is enough to prove you wrong. Moreso, other people in this very thread have mentioned that while, yes, they did indeed send out a warning, the warning was severely out of scale for what actually happened, exactly like I said in the comment you replied to.

Is everyone just too far in their bubbles now that they reject whatever actually happened in favor of whatever narrative their side of the internet made up?

The irony being, by ignoring the context of my comment as well as the thread as a whole, this is exactly what you're doing.

Hug every fascist, amirite?

Man, I wish instance blocks extended to users.

That pic is from r/conservative. That's like looking for accurate history on a .ml community. These fucking clowns would deny being struck by lightning if a Republican told them to.

I live in the Texas panhandle, which was not subject to the flooding rains. They still got everything wrong, though. Not four hours ago, they said my area wasn't going to get any rain. Guess what? Heavy rain right fucking now.