Ganbat

Postal 2 is fucked up goofy satire, so it's not quite so bad. Postal 1 is serious all the way through, and is entirely about a man suffering from severe untreated psychosis going on a killing spree through an Arizona city. That one is fucked up.

1 week free access to the service that did it in the first place is my favorite class action outcome.

You do know those don't really mean anything unless used by a government agency, right?

They hired an investigator? Any investigator worth a shit is gonna say that they're liable for failing to secure private data they collected, ~~as well as for retaining data they were apparently legally obligated to delete~~

Edit: Misread that segment, they actually presented it as if they were deleted to users, but apparently retained them to comply with vague "law enforcement requirements."

It's worse than that. The community is one where voting, either up or down, is the primary intended form of interaction. Well, at least that's what they say.

Edit: Ah, actually, maybe I misunderstood that. I read the message that each post has and took it as voting voting, but it could mean text voting.

"Yeah, my friend was a pedo human trafficker and he got some of his victims from my business and I knew about it and hid it and... uh... Hillary's E-mails did it."

Not really. I've heard stories about people getting sued after finding vulnerabilities. Of course the cases would get thrown out, but that's assuming you can eat the mountains of legal fees it'll take to actually get to a judge.

Hm... Jonah Hill.

Gonna be real, "crash test dummy" is getting me caught up here.

The biggest name in Jeffrey Epstein’s birthday book back in 2003 was a past president rather than a future one.

Very deliberate first line. As it's written, it implies that Donald Trump's name isn't in the book. The reference in the tagline wasn't even necessary. These companies know most people stick to the tagline and don't read the whole article.

I'm talking about why they WANT to do it.

Hm... Looks to me like you're making excuses for a group of crazy anti-LGBTQ evangelicals who are using lies and slander to police the world based on your own flawed morality.

While I generally do feel that some level of preemptive action is acceptable and even necessary for this type of community, some of the actions in question have been... extreme. And worse, some of the actions have been taken across communities that don't relate at all.

An example being the fairly recent discussion, in which a user found themselves banned from communities about AI art, PS2 games and Switch piracy because they downvoted one or two things they passed on all and didn't like. At this point, we've gone beyond any form of sanity in the actions.