FundMECFSResearch

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Me staring at my shit in the toilet like

👁️👄👁️

I already had onion breath by the time I saw the comm name.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

🫡

It feels nice to feel seen and not be dismissed as a political issue for once. Thanks.

Oh no what a tradgedy. I hope this never happens in real life.

OLED’s are a downgrade

It includes paris. and the rest is like mostly wheats fields so that’s why it didn’t get included

(the latin alphabet is the same alphabet english is currently written in.)

German and Italian manage to be phonetic using it.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As someone who has gone through gestures vaguely uhhh bad shit

I can’t tell you how much I fucking hate “What’s the worst that could happen?”. Whenever someone says that I wanna slap em 😂

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You dont need IPA to make it phonetic though:

You can stick with latin and just make phonetic rules consistent so if you hear a word you automatically know how to spell it. Like in german.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

People trust the fucking police and army more than unions. That’s just a fucking sad state.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30916829

A 'Crazy Idea' About Pluto Was Just Confirmed in a Scientific First

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/27093935

Are these three statements true:

(1) We can observe where A hits (thereby seeing A as a particle instead of a wave) before B’s path determines the availability of information?

(2) Measuring where A hits, (even if done with thousands of previous data points of A sorted by B hits showing the interference patterns) has no predictive power over whether B’s whichpath information will be erased or not?

(3) Whether or not B’s whichpath information was erased, has predictive power over where A landed?

 

Are these three statements true:

(1) We can observe where A hits (thereby seeing A as a particle instead of a wave) before B’s path determines the availability of information?

(2) Measuring where A hits, (even if done with thousands of previous data points of A sorted by B hits showing the interference patterns) has no predictive power over whether B’s whichpath information will be erased or not?

(3) Whether or not B’s whichpath information was erased, has predictive power over where A landed?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30756980

Oh really?

In a user manual I came across recently.

 

Alt Text:

there is a stairway to heaven and a guy in a wheelchair saying fucking dick

Original Post

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›