Frub

joined 2 years ago
[–] Frub@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But I'm not commenting on the validity of it

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah no that's accurate

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Nah the lib comes from the sprinkle of lmao

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah that was honestly my only concern with this. That and durability. But it doesn't really seem like a problem. Replaceable batteries also means replaceable back glass (or screen?) So that's awesome.

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That sounds like strong left slightly lib

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It doesn't? Lol

I pirated Photoshop just in case but genuinely haven't used it more than twice so idk

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Also cars like the Toyota Mirai have a range of 400 miles, which is not bad at all considering that the median range for a car in the US is 403 miles.

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (11 children)

As long as they can engineer a water resistant phone with these guidelines I'm all for it.

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

The same infrastructure argument could go for electric though. It's difficult to build infrastructure for these vehicles yes I agree but why would electric be any easier?

Also don't quote me on this but i think there are ways to collect hydrogen at a home, which would reduce the need for these stations, at least in the city

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd love to see the technology develop more but it's definitely not viable today. It's like when EVs started out.

[–] Frub@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The technology is extremely underdeveloped. That's why it's so expensive and impractical right now. Batteries aren't ecological saints either.

view more: ‹ prev next ›