Do you mean ancaps? Because I'm pretty sure most libertarian would be for universal healthcare. I have heard Americans use libertarian for ancap which are pretty opposing ideologies, I'm not sure what's up with that.
FluffyPotato
joined 2 years ago
Walking your cat on a leash is pretty common here. I can't even remember when I last saw a cat just roaming freely.
Wouldn't be an issue since a president can't do shit here, it's a representative role. The most power goes to a coalition government since one party has never ever had enough votes to govern on their own and it's unlikely that can even happen. The government is always made up of a ton of people from different parties.
We also had a party that tried to import American politics and they got into power along with a national and centrist party but they basically were too incompetent to do anything and the other coalition members just left which caused a new government to form without them. They wanted to prevent same sex marriage to even be a possibility and they failed at it even though Estonia isn't the most LGBT friendly place.
Now even if that party were competent and were in power solo they still couldn't do much with national IDs since that system is controlled by many different government entities and our riigikogu does not control those, they could try to pass some laws but a lot of major changes would need a referendum which would also fail and then trigger an election.
Estonia has had this kind of digital ID for like a decade
Oh yea, I was consulting in a factory recently and one production line was running off of Finnish windows XP with no service packs because the software for the machines doesn't support anything else.
Google has been unusable in English for at least 2 years now. Searching in Estonian makes Google behave like it did when it was still good. I wonder how long that's going to last.
Majority of cars here are sold used for 2 - 5k euros, very few people can afford new cars.
I have never said to remove all roads. What? I said reduce the funding for repairs and new construction to build the rail infrastructure....
You can go argue with the person in your head instead, I'm not sure where else your pulling these position from.
You seem to have an issue with making assumptions while going out of your way to assume and strawman everything. Even the comment at you being American was a jab at you for assuming I'm young though I'm in my 50s, I was hoping you notice that and stop making assumptions.
I said government funding for transit should focus mainly on rail as that would actually reduce pollution. Private entities should obviously be free to develop EVs but I never advocated for the removal of busses, ambulances, firefighters and enviourmental regulations. Where the fuck did you even get that, or are you arguing with someone else?
EV adoption would take far longer than decades since it relies on each person to switch over which will not even start happening in the next decade if you can stop all ICE vehicle production tomorrow. Outside of really rich people most buy used cars that are at least 5 years old, commonly even 10 years. If you want EV mass adoption there needs to be used EVs available for around 5000 to 2000 euros that don't need a new battery before you can use it. That kind of tech doesn't even exist yet.
To fix climate change you don't need to serve literally everyone with EVs, you need to reduce emissions enough and rail would serve the transit needs of more people than EVs ever could so that's where I want government funding for transit to go to. You seem to be more in the camp that we need a perfect solution that serves every person on the planet but EVs can't even do that.
All in all getting rid of carbon credits and taxing all emissions no matter where you are in the world would help even more but this post is about EVs.
Oh yea, shipping by water is obviously more efficient but creating waterways everywhere is quite a lot harder and expensive than building rail. I'm mostly addressing transit for humans but for ships nuclear may be a better option for pollution but that's not something I have looked into.
Wait, so you want government investment to focus on electric cars even though it won't have an impact on climate change? I want that investment in rail because rail is most likely to have the largest impact while being doable in a short term for the vast majority of the population. Electric vehicle adoption has zero chance to reach a point where it would have an impact.
I get that your an American that car companies have propagandised to oblivion but public transit works and it works better than electric cars for most people. If you are a farmer living 200km from any other human you aren't using an electric vehicle anyways.
People who live away from all settlements make up maybe up to 5% of population if being generous and they can all roll coal and it would still be a net win if the vast majority of people take a tram or train instead of a car or plane. Also people living in the middle of nowhere have no infrastructure to recharge their cars anyway if they need to drive outside the car's range so it's not like electric cars help them.
You are not living in reality if you think electric vehicle adoption can be fast enough to have any effect on climate change. Building a proper electric train and tram network on the other hand is doable in a short timeframe while being cheaper.
The idea that you just have loose ammo in the folds of your bags instead of crumbs is so insane and also so stereotypical of americans. 12 years is a little much but I have less sympathy since the US constantly locks citizens of other countries away for longer for less dangerous offences.
Like around here if you store ammo inappropriately like this will get your gun license yoinked permanently faster than you can blink. Like the dangerous part of owning guns is the ammo, without it guns are just an ineffective club, and ammo can go off without a gun.