It doesn't make sense to target canola oil due to a study using safflower oil, safflower oil has almost no omega-3s while canola has lots. I think we should use less refined fats in our cooking, but for what we do use I think canola is one of the better options.
Floey
joined 2 years ago
This is not a proper dichotomy as organic isn't about level of processing, it deals with farming conditions and species.
Also processing a spectrum. For example a smoothie and juice are both processed fruit but the smoothie has everything that the whole foods have in it while the juice is missing some of the nutrients, notably the fiber. If you then add refined sugar to that juice to make it more palatable that is further processing, and if you reduce that juice to a jelly that is further processing, with each of these processing stages you are making the food more calorically dense. Processing can also make a food easier to eat or improve the nutrition though, processing isn't inherently a good or bad thing but it very often is one of those.
My point was that the wealthiest people have most of their wealth in assets that are protected from inflation.
A jock isn't a "male prep" though, a jock is a specific type of male prep and male preps are just preps.
Somebody is going to want to fuck the lamp.
Printing more money and using it for public works or giving it directly to the poor could be a valid form of wealth redistribution that doesn't require collecting taxes. The problem of course is capital, it's immune to this kind of inflation, though rich people who have their wealth in debt would be hurt.
Why would you starve if you couldn't afford eggs? This is a ridiculous strawman.
Just got mine yesterday.
The narrative here is so ignorant. What does not having highly invasive anti cheat have to do with these kinds of exploits? If anything having those kinds of anti cheat would create a bigger vulnerability.