FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago

You both are right, and wrong. This, annoyingly, varies by location.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago

holy fuck AMD's logo is a cube!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 3 weeks ago

Stålmannen går på en krypto-nit

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 4 weeks ago

I believe both directions have been used in different cultures. Don't quote me on that one though.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

I bet you some do!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

i bet you some do!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

US law is an interesting response to an ethics question

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago

The problem with only counting calories for health has never been more aptly highlighted!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

as does the same amount of any other substance, including for example yoghurt.

That number is just the E in E=mc²

If we are actually talking dietary calories, the number you see on foodstuff packaging, plutonium has 0.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.

That sounds great actually! Lets see how they actually implement it though. After how they communicated this previously, I'm hesitant to get my hopes up.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 1 month ago

when comparing to kg I will assume the mass unit, since comparing a mass value to a force has no meaning.

view more: ‹ prev next ›