FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don't understand baby food. If your diet is relatively healthy you can just give them your normal food.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

president is statistically the job in the US with the highest rate of mortality.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

we can if we want, its called Polish notation
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_notation

instead of x + y we write + x y
then 2 + 3 * (3 + 7) + 6 becomes + 2 + * 3 + 3 7 6

no order of operations to remember, but good luck parsing it.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

it rusts less, far less in fact, but it still does rust.

Also there are different grades, i bet they cheaped out

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Your ATM's have fees?!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

block the worst offenders, it makes a world of difference

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then turning Ukraine into Russian territory is a bit counter productive no? That would literally bring NATO to Russias doorstep.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

Not exactly. Arguments like "they should be regulated because they can be used for illegal stuff" are moot, since those usages are already regulated. I'm on the fence on the whole regulation thing and I've yet to see any actual realistic examples on how regulation would look.

Is it even logical to regulate ai images specifically, or should we lump it in together with any form of image manipulation?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not saying deepfakes should not be regulated.

I'm saying the examples are poor because scamming people is already illegal.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

oh I never disagreed with that

view more: ‹ prev next ›