Primary colours are not made up, they are the approximate peak response frequencies of the cone cells in your retinas.
FishFace
joined 2 weeks ago
In the UK we had Guy Fawkes' night for that, though it has now been somewhat supplanted by the reimported Hallowe'en traditions from the USA.
Of course, the USA was supposed to have Thanksgiving to hold Christmas at bay, and apparently that didn't work, so good luck.
Let's recap. The comment you replied to said that it would be false to say "ICE executes a US citizen by shooting him in the back of the head" because ICE didn't kill him, and he wasn't shot in the back of the head.
You replied (sarcastically) with "That's OK then," implying that you thought it was necessary to tell someone who stated correctly that ICE didn't kill a man that what ICE did wasn't OK. To be clear, that person didn't say, "this is fine because the guy is still alive", they were just correcting someone who falsely said ICE killed someone.
So why do you think literally anyone here thinks it is OK that someone got shot? Nobody has said that it's OK. Just to spell it out:
you have read someone making a correct point that ICE didn't kill someone as "ICE shot someone, but it's OK."
To me, that says one thing: you think that it is not important to speak the truth about ICE if that truth is that they didn't behave in the worst possible way. Any truth that doesn't align with the narrative of "ICE bad" is not important truth to you, right? The only statements that should be written are those which criticise ICE.
Does that sound about right? If so, then I'll just say again: you need to be better than that. If not, then what possible reason do you have for asking "do you think it's OK he got shot" when no-one said that it is OK?
All the time? Or only some of the time?
Does the truth only matter to you if it's aligned in all respects with the narrative?
Be better.
That colour scale can get in the bin.
What struck me is that the CBP didn't even respond to comment. Even the IDF pretends to investigate its war crimes.
Can you prove it in court? If not, he shouldn't go to prison. It's an easy formula.
I'm perfectly happy calling him a nonce, but I'm also one of those old-fashioned types who values the rule of law and all...
By all accounts Andrew will be fuming because he's up himself.
Yes, thanks
But they aren't. They're the colours corresponding to the peak frequency responses of the cone cells in your retinas.