Well people say it does. Of course it's trivial to adapt such algorithms to include misspellings
FishFace
joined 3 weeks ago
Unburdened ebook stores that actually stock "everything" is a necessary component here.
Agreed. And a lot of it is working around limitations of whatever version of Java was common at the time.
"Visitor pattern" is better implemented as an implementation of Iterator or whatever your language calls that. Everyone knows what "for x in thing" means, but wtf does it mean to "visit" something?
I think Ousterhout's observation that deep interfaces are more useful is a very astute one. There is a kind of programmer who finds it satisfying to write lots of boilerplate but it doesn't make the code maintainable.
Short functions can be good because you then name each short section of code, but a comment can offer that more flexibly.
An ai model can't "sabotage attempts to shut it down" if it's not plugged into mechanisms that can actually do that.
"gamer culture" was not adopted by the mainstream; video games were. The culture of mainstream gamers remains distinct from the old culture
What makes you say this is going into her profit? There's a lot of competition in coffee shops, so if what you say it's true there'll be someone undercutting her.
It's more likely that besides beans her other costs have gone up, too.
It also doesn't make sense to maintain absolute profits instead of a percentage margin. Low margin means that you aren't hedging as much against risk (if your stock is destroyed in a fire you have to pay the cost of the stock, which has increased) and aren't paying yourself any more in the face of the rising costs YOU are paying every day.
This idea does not adequately address reality.
Iirc you'd finish around 9pm with breaks half way through and between each film, so there's even extra time for bathroom breaks really.
Citation needed
If it's just a JavaScript thing, not a link, it won't work. This is a gripe I have with the Lemmy webapp - some links in the messages UI are not real links
Maybe.
All of this means that your proposed method requires toilets every couple of hundred metres between city centres and suburbs. That sounds like a ridiculous waste of resources.
It's not a solution for most people.