Alright. I DON’T agree.
You should; death as a post-hoc punishment is abhorrent and serves no one.
Alright. I DON’T agree.
You should; death as a post-hoc punishment is abhorrent and serves no one.
If the claim that illegal is sometimes derogatory is true then the the claim illegal is always derogatory or never derogatory is false.
No it isn't. Nothing about "sometimes" being true itself proves the corollary "always" is false.
Besides, you would think you could end this by giving the example to refuse to proffer of a non-derogatory use.
Well then. Murdering someone as ex-post "punishment" for past actions remains abhorrent, but holding a gun to her head until she gives the money back is cool and good.
There is a difference between threatening violence as a deterrent against currently engaged in harms a person has the ability to cease and claiming moral authority to end a person's life due to things they have no control over.
There's distinction between "Put down the box or we'll shoot you." and "Having touched the box in the past, you now need to die regardless."
Still don't fuck with "The death penalty" as a framework for the threat, however.
state your fucking position.
I already did, and I don't feel you are arguing in good enough faith—having been willing to concede being trans "is sinful"—to address you in any deeper detail.
You jump on the name thing rather than seeing it as an outcrop of assigning sex and gender and then bitch about it in other threads using disingenuous descriptions that conflate the two but only address the later.
Allow me some cognitive dissonance
Not if you use it to advocate state murder I won't.
killing them leads to the inevitability of innocent people dying.
Innocent people will always have the ability to die, no matter how many people your state murders.
Each one of those assaults is a potentially life-altering trauma induced in a child.
Don't tell me what being abused as a child does to someone, thanks.
Does killing the person who did it make the assault not have happened?
What do you do?
Concede being trans is sinful?
Oh wait no, that's what you do.
How do you even research this?
I take a guess and then see how many formats for that guess I can find. It helps to know alot of home video formats I can check against.
Tell you though it isn't easy because search engines have noticeably began to suck donkey ass of late. All the skills I've developed have turned worthless as searching no long works the way it did a scant few years ago.
I would wonder if there's a Bollywood film that meets the same criteria and could be a strong contender?
I suppose it's possible Deewaar or Muqaddar Ka Sikandar got a whole bunch of other releases (the second was popular in The Soviet Union) but other than that I don't think laserdisc was ever released in India and that's a whole format. Since some of these films released on near every format every one counts.
“Okay. What do you think we should do instead?”
Stop doing that. Christ on a cracker.
If I told you "kicking puppies is wrong" would you demand 'an alternative' to do instead?
Don't kick puppies.
Take the money, sure. Then they're no longer billionaires and there's no need to kill them.
The way these people affect so many lives negatively with their fraud is much worse than a person committing murder.
Irrespective how is two bad things better than one bad thing? I would think fewer bad things would be net better.
The literal misery they cause to so many people for their own benefit without a fucking iota of shame and their sociopathic behavior is enough to consider eliminating them from society.
You speak of "sociopathic behavior" while advocating state murder. 🤨
That's a response.
Thank you. It'll indeed be much nicer without you advocating state murder in it. 🙂