FermatsLastAccount

joined 2 years ago
[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Everything on the planet eats everything else on the planet.

I believe that's called the appeal to nature fallacy. Something happening in nature doesn't mean it's morally right. Lions often commit infanticide, but that obviously doesn't make it okay for humans to do.

Most wouldn’t be alive anyway if they weren’t grown for food.

That would be much better than breeding billions of animals and putting them under the conditions we do, just because people like how they taste.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Those 100 people would still be eating 90% as many animals as they were before. People don't need to eat animals to live, so expecting praise for eating 10% less is pretty funny.

It'd be like a criminal deciding to decrease the amount of crimes he commits by 10% and expecting people to encourage and praise him.

Did you go on flathub.org or www.flathub.org? The certs are fine on the former, but expired on the latter.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Vegans don't eat animals for the sake of the animals, because they believe killing them unnecessarily is morally wrong.

Saying you're only going to eat animals once a day is like saying you're going to halve the amount of violent crimes you commit and expecting praise for it.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

Pretty sure that's not it. People are saying removed as a joke. It's a filter for slurs, not swears.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Someone who exclusively ate meat for some reason who moved to chicken would have a greater impact than someone who exclusively ate chicken and went vegan.

But that first person could have an even bigger environmental impact by becoming Vegan instead of only eating chicken.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

It's almost certainly because OpenAI is throwing less computing power at it in order to decrease the cost.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

problems I imagined and sleep is one of them. Just because it’s technology doesn’t mean it doesn’t need rest.

That actually is what it means.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If they just sit around and you don't play them, I'd probably just sell them. Emulating is so much more convenient.

But who cares what I'd do? Your life is your own. If collecting retro games brings you joy, then go for it.

The article is click bait, I agree. I'm referring to OP's post, though. Not the entire article.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Did you not read the post?

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Firefox's app puts me at "∞". I think that's what they put if you're above 100.

view more: ‹ prev next ›