FarceOfWill

joined 2 years ago
[–] FarceOfWill 13 points 1 month ago

So he gave them something and the...canary... is sad he didn't then have to pay inheritance tax on something he gifted when it came back to him?

Shit stirring tbh. He could've just kept it the whole time but wanted his parents to feel ownership and independence. This isn't a tax dodge it's just how tax rules work.

[–] FarceOfWill 5 points 1 month ago

I didn’t ask for this.

What a shame.

[–] FarceOfWill 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

The only reason to not shoot them down is cos it gives away the behaviour of the defence systems.

Best if we can find some 90s tech to shoot them with to keep putin guessing

[–] FarceOfWill 96 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If the Google war on ad blocking meant the ad blockers accidently blocked something everyone wants its still Google fault.

Everything was fine until Google decided to change how everything works over and over again to get people to watch the awful ads they let on their platform.

[–] FarceOfWill 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The majority of finance institutions will have multiple live servers in two places. Eg. new Jersey and as far away as Virginia. Some have three.

The data itself will be in even more locations as backups, but might take a while to recover if multiple sites were attacked at once.

[–] FarceOfWill 29 points 1 month ago

Don't worry NK, you're also nothing without china

[–] FarceOfWill 26 points 1 month ago

AI = Actually Indians

[–] FarceOfWill 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

From our point of view the eu are evil.

(Our perspective as voted by the public :( )

[–] FarceOfWill 2 points 1 month ago

I have autoplay disabled, how is this cheeky video playing

[–] FarceOfWill 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right but they're usually doing something complicated to pay less tax.

Getting that wrong and underpaying is much worse than doing something complicated to deal with a complicated family issue, and the advisors missing an incredibly tough point combining multiple specialities.

[–] FarceOfWill 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

I dont really get why this is seen as an issue. This is fiendishly complex law that can easily be missed, and the trust was set up to try and give a child their own "stuff" as divorce made the parents doing it impossible.

Thus is just a non story.

Id rather the press was asking about the idcards that starmer has gone and raised again. Or their mad plans to ban vpns(?)

[–] FarceOfWill 4 points 2 months ago

No its a far left agit prop site. As worthless as sqwarkbox to me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›