FailBetter

joined 1 week ago
[โ€“] FailBetter@crust.piefed.social 10 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

Was hoping to find a few good alternatives in this commentsland

Wonder if this was indicative of a pass or fail๐Ÿค”

those adjectives put you in a necessarily desperate case to begin with though, no?

A position on AI says next to nothing about one's stance on humanity, right?

LibreWolf for Liiife (ironfox is cool imho tho)

Good deal. Hope I didn't frighten ya too much. :D I was also told that you should be able to feel the pressure against the screen before seeing a visible difference too. (I'm still a little peeved I didn't get more of a warning from the makers of my device, but that's life)

[โ€“] FailBetter@crust.piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm at the point where I'm no longer interested in better battery longevity --we gonna need safety ratings like vehicles at this trend

"die" is in quotes to indicate a figurative training/practice/simulation (read fake or test) death. --posting for anyone else who don't think too good (obvs me) and may need clarity Thank you for the explanation

Historically, the only thing we've learned from past events is that we can't ever learn from past events

[โ€“] FailBetter@crust.piefed.social 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Naive question, why wouldn't test-anythings be conducted much higher up to account for such erroneous potential?

[โ€“] FailBetter@crust.piefed.social 11 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

PSA This data correlates almost exactly with my battery stats before I realized the very dangerous battery swelling up like a balloon under the screen.

I'm very not observant and didn't notice any physical difference until the screen fell plum off the chassis

So you're saying if I pivot to windows, I can find a real job?

 

pure mate, or clean mate, a checkmate that meets the following criteria: unoccupied squares in the king's field are attacked once only; pieces that function as self-blocks[d] are not under attack unless necessarily pinned; and the mating move is not a double check unless this is necessary to prevent the defender from interposing a man or capturing a checking piece.

view more: next โ€บ