Facebones

joined 2 years ago
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because executive order was the only way to get it done - other methods would have required evidence that doesn't exist. You're only backing my argument lmao.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I appreciate you. I rescind my snark lol

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

With absolutely zero tangible evidence, which is why it was a complete non-starter for four years until Biden lost control of the narrative.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Please point to me where I said tiktok users were being censored. 🤔 Learn to read.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

This. People who believe the reasoning behind this need to understand that the same arguments were made last year and the idea was laughed at.

What's different is Biden took on another proxy war on the side of genocide and tiktok is the only platform they can't prevent using the word "genocide"

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago (13 children)

A federal tiktok ban is a desperate attempt to keep young people from discussing Joes pet genocide where they can't be censored by the us govt.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

I have every confidence scotus will do it too, apparently one of them was tossing around prenatal personhood today so from now on I'll be expecting the absolute worst ruling on every case they take.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com -5 points 1 year ago

Biden won't let them. Why do you think they suddenly care about shutting down tiktok? Its the only platform they can't bully into censorship.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Its not helping Biden not being able to censor information on his part genocide. None of them gave a fuck about tiktok until they told em to take down pro Palestinian content and got told "lulnope"

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

This is the thing for me, everyone who makes that argument is actually saying "a temperature change won't make us extinct." They don't care that we'll go extinct from the effects because cars go brrrr.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

The idea that affording $3k also means you can afford a $3k mortgage falls under what I'm saying about people swinging too far in the other direction - affording $3k in rent =/= affording a $3k mortgage plus taxes/insurance plus upkeep etc etc.

That being said our credit system is 100% busted. Engaging in predatory lending to build a credit score should not be the only way to "prove" financial fitness. Just because I pay my credit cards off every month doesn't mean I don't still waste like $300/mo on doordash 🤣

view more: ‹ prev next ›