I love the catch-22 that this puts Trump in. If he declares that none of the details of the discussion were classified, then the journalist can release those details without legal issues. If he declares that they are classified, this happens.
FaceDeer
joined 2 years ago
The US isn't the sole authority that can declare a pandemic.
No need to wait for the next pandemic, this will cause devastation due to the previous one.
Yeah, I hope nobody took my comment to suggest that it's not worth voting at all in a "safe" riding. Frankly that's a bit liberating, if I was in a riding that was already certain to go to any party (Conservative, Liberal, Natural Law, whatever) then that would mean I was free to vote my conscience. The popular vote doesn't mean anything in absolute legal terms but it's still a nice bit of psychological pressure to apply.
Yeah, I'm skeptical about those numbers. They're from February 9, and that's about when Trump's 51st-state bullshit first started making headlines. Nobody would have known what Smith's reaction would be yet.
Since we're in the doldrums between elections I don't imagine a whole lot of polling is being done right now, so no idea when that will update. But even with the numbers as they are, it's really not bad - NDP got 44% last election so 41% is still in the same ballpark, and the NDP has a new leader that obviously hasn't done any campaigning. He's a former mayor of Calgary and Calgary's the battleground that the election hinged on last time around.
The fact that we have no legal method of stopping her doesn't mean we're fine with what she's doing.
We hold elections every once in a while, like other provinces. It's unfortunate there isn't one in the immediate future, but eventually there will be one and right now I'm not liking her odds.
Were they obstructing the sidewalk? I could see Florida Lawyer making a case from that.
The move towards a two-party system is inevitable under first-past-the-post voting systems. This is why I considered Trudeau's betrayal of electoral reform to be a generational stab-in-the-back and swore I would never vote Liberal again.
And first-past-the-post is also why I am breaking that vow and voting Liberal in the upcoming election. My riding happens to be a "tossup" between Conservative and Liberal, and in this particular election I can't afford to "vote my conscience". The existence of Canada is at stake. And so I hold my nose really hard and recognize the reality of the facts before me.
Some people may be fortunate enough to be in ridings where a vote for NDP wouldn't literally help put Poilievre in power, but I am not. I must do what I can to actually help. I recommend everyone check your riding's polling numbers to confirm whether you have that luxury.
They do not, and this is an offensive stereotype. Half of Albertans didn't even vote for her, and I'm sure a substantial portion of those who did are not "fine" with her helping foreign governments take over Canada.
According to a recent poll 12% of Albertans would "definitely consider" joining the US. Sounds bad, yeah? But Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario come right behind at 11%. Should we also say "Ontarians are fine with helping foreign governments take over Canada"?
I'm not asking anyone to "have faith." I'm just asking you to recognize that statements like:
Albertans remain fine with her election interference and helping foreign govts take over Canada
Are an inaccurate and frankly downright offensive stereotype. Albertans are not "fine" with helping foreign governments take over Canada. That statement is tarring an entire population with a vile accusation.
I said it was a near 50/50 split. It happened to fall on the Danielle Smith side of that split, and so she won the election. If just a few percent more had gone NDP then it would have been the other way around. This is fairly typical of how elections work, I'm not sure what more needs to be explained.
The actual popular vote split was 52.63%/44.05%, though of course thanks to first-past-the-post the split of the number of seats in the legislature wasn't as close as that. The maps look bluer because of the huge sparsely-populated rural regions that voted Conservative, but remember, land doesn't vote. Those huge sparsely-populated rural regions don't have as many representatives as the cities.
The US only "standardized" the colours in 2000, it has a long and confusing history of mixing it up themselves.