I'm not saying vote for Musk. I'm saying vote for a Democrat.
FaceDeer
joined 2 years ago
Pay no attention to the bad treatment! Ignore the 51st state rhetoric that Trump is still spouting despite me saying he was done! Give us money!
Ants swarm, though.
You still are, just in a different way.
It's always interesting seeing the hatred of AI clash with the hatred of Reddit.
I'm "pro-AI" in the sense that I don't knee-jerk oppose it.
I do in fact use AI to summarize things a lot. I've got an extension in Firefox that'll do it to anything. It generally does a fine job.
And when I saw the reply it had plenty of downvotes already, because this is technology@lemmy.world and people are quick to pounce on anything that sounds like it might be pro-AI. You're doing it yourself now, eyeing me suspiciously and asking if I'm one of those pro-AI people. Since there were plenty of downvotes the ambiguity of your comment meant my interpretation should not be surprising.
It just so happens that I am a Wikipedia editor, and I'm also pro-AI. I think this would be a very useful addition to Wikipedia, and I hope they get back to it when the dust settles from this current moral panic. I'm disappointed that they're pausing an experiment because that means that the "discussion" that will be had now will have less actually meaningful information in it. What's the point in a discussion without information to discuss?
No Wikipedia editor has to work on anything, if they don't want to interact with those summaries then they don't have to.
And no, it wasn't quite obvious that that's what you were talking about. You said "Looks like the vast majority of people disagree D:". Since you were directly responding to a comment that had been heavily downvoted by the technology@lemmy.world community it was a reasonable assumption that those were the people you were talking about.
Disabling would necessarily mean disabling it wiki-wide,
No it wouldn't, why would you think that? Wikipedia has plenty of optional features that can be enabled or disabled on a per-user basis.
Did Anthropic accept the ToS? Reddit's publishing their information on a public website that anyone can visit and read without agreeing to any terms. If they didn't accept the ToS then the only thing regulating what you can do with that public information is the usual copyright. AI training has yet to be shown to be a violation of copyright.
So it's trivial for Musk to decide who you vote for, then. You don't care about the candidate's position, just whose "team" he's on.
It's kind of pathetic watching Americans continue sabotaging their chances of getting out of authoritarian control even now. What will it take to end that purity spiral?