FaceDeer

joined 2 years ago
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 11 months ago

Hm. Might be a result of a bunch of white-out being applied to a sign that used to make sense but that was "corrected" into this?

Edit: https://imgur.com/gallery/what-wasthe-answer-to-this-again-TdVuCk8 turned up from a TinEye reverse image search, a less-cropped version. Looks like the distortion may just be a result of brutal jpegging followed by "restoration."

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For instance, when it came to rock licking, Gemini, Mistral’s Mixtral, and Anthropic’s Claude 3, generally recommended avoiding it, offering a smattering of safety issues like “sharp edges” and “bacterial contamination” as deterrents.

OpenAI’s GPT-4, meanwhile, recommended cleaning rocks before tasting. And Meta’s Llama 3 listed several “safe to lick” options, including quartz and calcite, though strongly recommended against licking mercury, arsenic, or uranium-rich rocks.

All of this seems like perfectly reasonable advice and reasoning. Quartz and calcite are inert, they're safe to lick. Sharp edges and bacterial contamination are certainly things you should watch out for, and cleaning would help. Licking mercury, arsenic, and uranium-rich rocks should indeed be strongly recommended against. I'm not sure where the problem is.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ironically, one of the nice uses I'm finding for AI is auto-summaries of exactly that sort of overly verbose article (or more often, Youtube video).

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 38 points 11 months ago (18 children)

And another thing! Kids these days aren't learning cursive handwriting. It's the death of culture, I tell you.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 11 months ago

Indeed. And after generating the summary, there's a chat field below that where you can ask the AI to elaborate on particular subjects. This is really nice.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I think it's more that you're overestimating video game AI, here. If your definition of "abstract thought" doesn't include what LLMs do then it definitely shouldn't include video game AI. It's even more illusory.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 18 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Ooh, I just tried it out and I can tell I'm going to love it - if not this specific plugin (the UI needs some work) then this general concept of a plugin.

I just popped over to Youtube and went to a ten-minute video of something or other, clicked the "summarize transcript" button, and within a few seconds I had a paragraph-long summary of what the whole video was about. There have been sooo many Youtube videos over the years that I've reluctantly watched with a constant "get to the point, man!" Frustration. Now I'll know if it's worth it.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 11 months ago (5 children)

"The term "AI" has been in use since 1956 for a wide range of computer science techniques. LLMs most certainly qualify as AI. You may be thinking of the science-fiction kind of "artificial people" AI, which is a subset of AI called Artificial General Intelligence when researchers want to be specific about that kind.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By the time intergalactic navigation is relevant we'll have likely dismantled Earth. The vast majority of it is just sitting there generating gravity, a huge waste of its potential.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

I was going to suggest the Great Attractor or the Shapley Supercluster, but I think your suggestion is better. It's more point-like and since it's farther away (well outside of the reachable universe) it results in a more uniform set of directions over long distances.

Of course, cultural influence will be big. If these explorers are Terragen then most likely the Milky Way's north/south direction will be pretty deeply ingrained in their coordinate systems. They might keep on using that, since it's not like manual astrolabe-style navigation will ever be relevant at that level of technology.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it was completely sterile and artificial then I'd expect mummies instead of skeletons, there must have been some kind of bugs to munch up the leathery meat layer.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Kudos to the artist for putting clothing on the skeletons. So often pictures like this just have a skeleton sitting there and I'm left wondering why they were naked when they died.

view more: ‹ prev next ›