Did you read the article? The part of the web that is having problems with their business model are the sites that are not using AI. They're sites like news pages, the "sources" for information on the web. The ones that are eating their lunch are the ones that are using AI. They're the search engines and similar sites that people go to looking for information. Since AI is able to gather the information from those sources and present it to the user without the user having to actually visit that site, that undermines their existing business model.
FaceDeer
joined 1 year ago
I suspect it's more because of Elon Musk hate.
It is also possible for someone who has done something bad to be the victim of something else that is bad.
It's possible for both of those people to have done something bad.
Or, perhaps a lot of people just didn't think it was a very good show.
Well, direct your ire at the EU for that, I suppose. I'm just pointing out that calling for massive retribution against Meta isn't warranted here.
the social media giant will not sign the European Union’s voluntary AI code of practice.
Emphasis added. If the result of not signing a voluntary code of practice is massive fines and IP blocks, was it really "voluntary?"
The article literally references the legend of John Henry, yeah.
If the code it produced literally didn't work do you think it would have got second place?
Did you read the article? It says:
The competition required contestants to solve a single complex optimization problem over 600 minutes.
Trump was first elected in 2016, which is almost a decade ago now.
The voters that elected Trump will still be around after Trump's heart explodes from hamberder overload.